Tools & Wizards About Us
rrfiresafety.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rrfiresafety.com

Fire Extinguisher, Fire Alarm, Fire Suppression Systems, and Emergency light Inspections

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

194 ms

rrfiresafety.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rr Fire Safety content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rrfiresafety.com

Trust R&R Fire and Safety with all of your fire safety needs. We offer fire suppression systems, fire extinguishers, inspections,and emergency lights, fire alarm inspections, fire alarm install, fire ...

Visit rrfiresafety.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rrfiresafety.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rrfiresafety.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.365

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rrfiresafety.com

53 ms

site.css

10 ms

duel.js

6 ms

addthis_widget.js

38 ms

scc-c2.min.js

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rrfiresafety.com, 39% (20 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 18% (9 requests) were made to Nebula.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) relates to the external source Nebula.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rrfiresafety.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 49.9 kB

  • Original 62.0 kB
  • After minification 62.0 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rr Fire Safety images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 121.5 kB

  • Original 222.7 kB
  • After minification 222.6 kB
  • After compression 101.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121.5 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 99 B

  • Original 19.1 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rrfiresafety.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (57%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rr Fire Safety. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rrfiresafety.com

www.rrfiresafety.com

53 ms

site.css

site.css

10 ms

duel.js

duel.js

6 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

38 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

34 ms

jq.js

jq.js

26 ms

d70b3106845b65fc4eaa21ef083721b8

d70b3106845b65fc4eaa21ef083721b8

225 ms

media.gallery.js

media.gallery.js

58 ms

facebookSDKHelper.js

facebookSDKHelper.js

31 ms

social.share.js

social.share.js

49 ms

cookiemanager.js

cookiemanager.js

50 ms

iebackground.js

iebackground.js

29 ms

d837f4e6f08369fddbb128164ac6beab

d837f4e6f08369fddbb128164ac6beab

334 ms

df82ed9093d7c0e0aafc29b3144b7d12

df82ed9093d7c0e0aafc29b3144b7d12

365 ms

ec3dac6403131fc51bf052abec4dc07f

ec3dac6403131fc51bf052abec4dc07f

150 ms

22441b7c43e0bc7d651c805b327c3694

22441b7c43e0bc7d651c805b327c3694

218 ms

475b680c3e212e501aeaa307e546eb06

475b680c3e212e501aeaa307e546eb06

218 ms

92932f269e7c8e48a9c15fb9707358de

92932f269e7c8e48a9c15fb9707358de

272 ms

f8553f859f5505b26a87003d970e0080

f8553f859f5505b26a87003d970e0080

322 ms

util.fbSDKLoader.js

util.fbSDKLoader.js

15 ms

util.window.js

util.window.js

37 ms

helper.js

helper.js

16 ms

growl.js

growl.js

36 ms

util.instances.js

util.instances.js

154 ms

util.model.js

util.model.js

28 ms

documentHelper.js

documentHelper.js

30 ms

browser.js

browser.js

5 ms

sf.core.pkg.js

sf.core.pkg.js

9 ms

app.css

app.css

9 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

11 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

5 ms

89 ms

QGYpz_kZZAGCONcK2A4bGOj8mNhL.woff

QGYpz_kZZAGCONcK2A4bGOj8mNhL.woff

16 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

18 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

16 ms

_Xmr-H4zszafZw3A-KPSZut9wQiX.woff

_Xmr-H4zszafZw3A-KPSZut9wQiX.woff

15 ms

page.php

page.php

274 ms

eef42b38dd978eb845c81723231781fd

eef42b38dd978eb845c81723231781fd

711 ms

page.php

page.php

50 ms

zoz2R2rH-QY.css

zoz2R2rH-QY.css

16 ms

BFVUlNP835L.js

BFVUlNP835L.js

22 ms

teTZ2tZqwkq.js

teTZ2tZqwkq.js

47 ms

BECqV_OB-Tv.js

BECqV_OB-Tv.js

48 ms

l7RSM02pHa3.js

l7RSM02pHa3.js

52 ms

q4SZVAjzsaO.js

q4SZVAjzsaO.js

51 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

51 ms

318457720_572566088209887_7614866220399353989_n.jpg

318457720_572566088209887_7614866220399353989_n.jpg

75 ms

314388057_540113408121822_4222647173790435742_n.jpg

314388057_540113408121822_4222647173790435742_n.jpg

53 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

7 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

11 ms

page.php

page.php

42 ms

Accessibility Review

rrfiresafety.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rrfiresafety.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rrfiresafety.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rrfiresafety.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rrfiresafety.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rrfiresafety.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rr Fire Safety. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: