Tools & Wizards About Us
rrocm.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

rrocm.com

Redi-Rock(r) of Central Maine is a Maine manufactures and distributor of the Redi-Rock(r) large block and the Redi-Scapes(r) small block retaining and...

Page Load Speed

36 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

21.8 sec

Page Rendered

13.8 sec

rrocm.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rrocm.com homepage info - get ready to check Rrocm best content right away, or after learning these important things about rrocm.com

Redi-Rock(r) of Central Maine is Northern and Central Maine's only authorized manufacturer and distributor of Redi-Rock(r) retaining and free-standing wall blocks and Redi-Scapes(r) hardscaping pr...

Visit rrocm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rrocm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 35.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rrocm.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,980 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.379

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

default.aspx

362 ms

bootstrap.css

233 ms

bootstrap-submenu.min.css

121 ms

font-awesome.min.css

647 ms

nivo-slider.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Rrocm.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.2 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 638.1 kB (30%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rrocm.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 17.1 kB
  • After minification 13.9 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rrocm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 217.4 kB

  • Original 320.8 kB
  • After minification 306.3 kB
  • After compression 103.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 392.1 kB

  • Original 470.1 kB
  • After minification 434.5 kB
  • After compression 78.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rrocm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 392.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (55%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rrocm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

default.aspx

default.aspx

362 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

233 ms

bootstrap-submenu.min.css

bootstrap-submenu.min.css

121 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

647 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

107 ms

default.css

default.css

106 ms

cycle2.css

cycle2.css

105 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

198 ms

haley.css

haley.css

655 ms

inventory.css

inventory.css

562 ms

helpers.css

helpers.css

605 ms

navbar-custom.css

navbar-custom.css

685 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

706 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1274 ms

jquery.matchheight.min.js

jquery.matchheight.min.js

1367 ms

bootstrap-submenu.min.js

bootstrap-submenu.min.js

1350 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.js

jquery.nivo.slider.js

1350 ms

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js

1398 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

1397 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

1412 ms

yOcM7FJLnM8

yOcM7FJLnM8

3622 ms

logo.png

logo.png

754 ms

background.png

background.png

901 ms

header-shadow.png

header-shadow.png

555 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

522 ms

slider-viking.jpg

slider-viking.jpg

1010 ms

redi-rock-01.jpg

redi-rock-01.jpg

1009 ms

redi-rock-02.jpg

redi-rock-02.jpg

1009 ms

redi-rock-03.jpg

redi-rock-03.jpg

985 ms

slider-mhfcu-01.jpg

slider-mhfcu-01.jpg

647 ms

slider-redi-scape-01.jpg

slider-redi-scape-01.jpg

986 ms

slider-redi-rock-01.jpg

slider-redi-rock-01.jpg

987 ms

slider-redi-scape-02.jpg

slider-redi-scape-02.jpg

988 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

987 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

921 ms

www-player-vflMqr8uC.css

www-player-vflMqr8uC.css

380 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

982 ms

base.js

base.js

1178 ms

id

id

5988 ms

YubHWiCUdycrt9r0pwxtCFMvWBBxMHmgtw0lFaZzSbY.js

YubHWiCUdycrt9r0pwxtCFMvWBBxMHmgtw0lFaZzSbY.js

6158 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

6158 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

2143 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

2126 ms

logo_ringo-vflOpz8ZI.png

logo_ringo-vflOpz8ZI.png

1860 ms

Accessibility Review

rrocm.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rrocm.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rrocm.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rrocm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rrocm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rrocm.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rrocm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: