Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

rscf.ru

Российский научный фонд | Создавая фундамент будущего

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

520 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

rscf.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rscf content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rscf.ru

Российский научный фонд занимается грантовой поддержкой научных исследований. Международными научными конкурсами.

Visit rscf.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Rscf.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 520 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rscf.ru performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.4 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,980 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rscf.ru

520 ms

rscf.ru

1046 ms

page_f81ccac1cae921826f6e64259e5fd835_v1.css

293 ms

template_9b4dda20d3b372f78a4acd01632c4576_v1.css

420 ms

bundle.css

688 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Rscf.ru, 4% (2 requests) were made to and 4% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rscf.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 395.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Rscf.ru main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 234.8 kB

  • Original 295.5 kB
  • After minification 252.8 kB
  • After compression 60.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 42.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 234.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 56.9 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rscf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 81.5 kB

  • Original 283.6 kB
  • After minification 283.6 kB
  • After compression 202.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 81.5 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

  • Original 80.7 kB
  • After minification 80.7 kB
  • After compression 57.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rscf.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (25%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rscf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rscf.ru accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rscf.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rscf.ru SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rscf.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rscf.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rscf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: