Tools & Wizards About Us
rsf-int.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

rsf-int.com

Manufacturer of audiovisual equipment for Museums and Exhibitions

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

434 ms

rsf-int.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rsf-int.com now to see the best up-to-date Rsf Int content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rsf-int.com

Manufacturer of audiovisual equipment for Museums and Exhibitions Audioguides, tour guides, audiovisual equipment, museums, installations, support

Visit rsf-int.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rsf-int.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rsf-int.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,300 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.132

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rsf-int.com

1069 ms

jquery.js

21 ms

font-awesome.min.css

34 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

233 ms

bootstrap.css

476 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Rsf-int.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rsf-int.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 499.7 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rsf-int.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 718.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 38.8 kB

  • Original 47.0 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 718.5 kB
  • After minification 699.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rsf Int images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 144.0 kB

  • Original 451.5 kB
  • After minification 451.0 kB
  • After compression 307.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.0 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 297.4 kB

  • Original 351.5 kB
  • After minification 319.6 kB
  • After compression 54.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rsf-int.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 297.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (58%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rsf Int. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rsf-int.com

www.rsf-int.com

1069 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

21 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

34 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

233 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

476 ms

basic.css

basic.css

248 ms

style.css

style.css

484 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

322 ms

script.js

script.js

246 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

317 ms

styles.css

styles.css

252 ms

styles.css

styles.css

253 ms

170829.js

170829.js

40 ms

element.js

element.js

41 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

458 ms

index.js

index.js

257 ms

api.js

api.js

44 ms

index.js

index.js

257 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

320 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

47 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

119 ms

logo-look.png

logo-look.png

164 ms

NEW-WEBSITE-BACKGROUND-2-1500x481.jpg

NEW-WEBSITE-BACKGROUND-2-1500x481.jpg

240 ms

NEW-WEBSITE-BACKGROUND-another-one2-1500x481.jpg

NEW-WEBSITE-BACKGROUND-another-one2-1500x481.jpg

239 ms

Grand-with-kid-left-to-right-1500x481.jpg

Grand-with-kid-left-to-right-1500x481.jpg

98 ms

NEW-WEBSITE-BACKGROUND-TWIST-CABLE-1500x481.jpg

NEW-WEBSITE-BACKGROUND-TWIST-CABLE-1500x481.jpg

176 ms

chagall-cropped.jpg

chagall-cropped.jpg

161 ms

world-map-cropped.jpg

world-map-cropped.jpg

237 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

149 ms

5-GUIDES_21-295x192.jpg

5-GUIDES_21-295x192.jpg

163 ms

circle-overlay.png

circle-overlay.png

229 ms

schneider-schumacher-Staedel-museum-3-295x192.jpg

schneider-schumacher-Staedel-museum-3-295x192.jpg

229 ms

shutterstock_182077334.jpg

shutterstock_182077334.jpg

328 ms

social.png

social.png

280 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

218 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

238 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

255 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

252 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

254 ms

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

321 ms

gothic.ttf

gothic.ttf

428 ms

js

js

143 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

37 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

89 ms

arrow-left.png

arrow-left.png

89 ms

arrow-right.png

arrow-right.png

88 ms

Accessibility Review

rsf-int.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rsf-int.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

rsf-int.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rsf-int.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rsf-int.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rsf-int.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rsf Int. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: