Tools & Wizards About Us
rsfhfoundation.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

rsfhfoundation.org

Roper St. Francis Foundation │ Roper St. Francis Healthcare

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

846 ms

Page Rendered

173 ms

rsfhfoundation.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rsfh Foundation content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rsfhfoundation.org

We work with our community to strengthen the Roper St. Francis Healthcare mission of healing all people with compassion, faith and excellence.

Visit rsfhfoundation.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Rsfhfoundation.org page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rsfhfoundation.org performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.179

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rsfhfoundation.org

89 ms

www.rsfhfoundation.org

170 ms

gtm.js

78 ms

main.css

95 ms

json2.js

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Rsfhfoundation.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Bat.bing.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (229 ms) belongs to the original domain Rsfhfoundation.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 788.7 kB (38%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rsfhfoundation.org main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 526.9 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rsfh Foundation needs image optimization as it can save up to 526.9 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 70.3 kB

  • Original 185.6 kB
  • After minification 169.1 kB
  • After compression 115.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 38% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 175.1 kB

  • Original 205.9 kB
  • After minification 173.2 kB
  • After compression 30.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rsfhfoundation.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 175.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (41%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rsfh Foundation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rsfhfoundation.org

rsfhfoundation.org

89 ms

www.rsfhfoundation.org

www.rsfhfoundation.org

170 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

78 ms

main.css

main.css

95 ms

json2.js

json2.js

38 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

117 ms

namespace.js

namespace.js

109 ms

SpecialCharacterUtilities.js

SpecialCharacterUtilities.js

108 ms

rsfh.js

rsfh.js

150 ms

monsido-script.js

monsido-script.js

214 ms

js

js

127 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

127 ms

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

131 ms

bat.js

bat.js

96 ms

NewsLetterSignup.html

NewsLetterSignup.html

26 ms

Foundation-Logo-Long.png

Foundation-Logo-Long.png

67 ms

logo.png

logo.png

66 ms

Roper-Hospital.jpg

Roper-Hospital.jpg

75 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

68 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

75 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

75 ms

RSF_Homepage_Banner_3.jpg

RSF_Homepage_Banner_3.jpg

229 ms

featureLeft.jpg

featureLeft.jpg

77 ms

featureCenter.jpg

featureCenter.jpg

120 ms

featureRight.jpg

featureRight.jpg

98 ms

pencil.gif

pencil.gif

97 ms

icon-social-footer.jpg

icon-social-footer.jpg

103 ms

arrow-up-large.png

arrow-up-large.png

118 ms

NewsLetterSignup.html

NewsLetterSignup.html

101 ms

robotoslab-bold-webfont.svg

robotoslab-bold-webfont.svg

53 ms

robotoslab-bold-webfont.woff

robotoslab-bold-webfont.woff

64 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

138 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

187 ms

5013699.js

5013699.js

12 ms

tracking.monsido.com

tracking.monsido.com

111 ms

mon-page-assist.js

mon-page-assist.js

51 ms

page-correct.js

page-correct.js

97 ms

Accessibility Review

rsfhfoundation.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rsfhfoundation.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rsfhfoundation.org SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rsfhfoundation.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rsfhfoundation.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rsfhfoundation.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rsfh Foundation. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: