Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

732 ms

Page Rendered

215 ms

rsginc.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rsginc.com now to see the best up-to-date RSG Inc content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rsginc.com

We shape a successful future through unmatched research and analytics by delivering work that is innovative and actionable.

Visit rsginc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rsginc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 947 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rsginc.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.272

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rsginc.com

172 ms

www.rsginc.com

104 ms

css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css

12 ms

css_EPsgvacVXxxhwhLr4DGj8P1D4es4L_QnnRJPHn_TJHE.css

15 ms

css_OhYgP1mpkwO2MsWbvzxATn4Z_3oXPiptwOWH_iSHr5o.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Rsginc.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 523.7 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Rsginc.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 50.0 kB

  • Original 70.1 kB
  • After minification 69.6 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 40.0 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 970.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RSG Inc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 406.3 kB

  • Original 610.3 kB
  • After minification 580.5 kB
  • After compression 204.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 406.3 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 36.6 kB
  • After minification 33.0 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rsginc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (49%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RSG Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rsginc.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rsginc.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rsginc.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rsginc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rsginc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RSG Inc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: