Tools & Wizards About Us
rshtechnology.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

rshtechnology.com

Website Designing Company in (India) | Website Development company in Faridabad (India) | Website designing company in Delhi | RSH Technology

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

547 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

758 ms

rshtechnology.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rshtechnology.com homepage info - get ready to check RSH Technology best content right away, or after learning these important things about rshtechnology.com

RSH Technology is a Website designing, Software development, Web & Mobile Application development company in Faridabad and Website designing company in Delhi(NCR).

Visit rshtechnology.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rshtechnology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 547 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rshtechnology.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.443

21/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rshtechnology.com

547 ms

rshtechnology.com

1018 ms

www.rshtechnology.com

1184 ms

googletagmanager.comgtagjsid=UA-179031379-1.js

280 ms

font-awesome.min.css

549 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Rshtechnology.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Rshtechnology.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 306.1 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

769.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rshtechnology.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 713.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 136.2 kB

  • Original 149.1 kB
  • After minification 76.5 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 72.6 kB, which is 49% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.2 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 163.6 kB

  • Original 713.5 kB
  • After minification 549.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RSH Technology needs image optimization as it can save up to 163.6 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 166.1 kB
  • After minification 166.1 kB
  • After compression 162.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 46.4 kB
  • After minification 46.4 kB
  • After compression 43.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rshtechnology.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (32%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

36

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RSH Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rshtechnology.com

rshtechnology.com

547 ms

rshtechnology.com

rshtechnology.com

1018 ms

www.rshtechnology.com

www.rshtechnology.com

1184 ms

googletagmanager.comgtagjsid=UA-179031379-1.js

googletagmanager.comgtagjsid=UA-179031379-1.js

280 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

549 ms

all.css

all.css

730 ms

style.css

style.css

723 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

852 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

852 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

850 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

853 ms

waypoint.js

waypoint.js

967 ms

counterup.js

counterup.js

969 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

988 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

981 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

993 ms

sticky.js

sticky.js

1095 ms

slicknav.min.js

slicknav.min.js

1210 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1202 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

1225 ms

form.js

form.js

1235 ms

active.js

active.js

1232 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

158 ms

logo.png

logo.png

636 ms

about-hover-bg.jpg

about-hover-bg.jpg

676 ms

home-1-service-bg.jpg

home-1-service-bg.jpg

1928 ms

section-right-img-1.png

section-right-img-1.png

1186 ms

slide-bg-3.jpg

slide-bg-3.jpg

947 ms

offers1.png

offers1.png

706 ms

counter-bg-1.jpg

counter-bg-1.jpg

831 ms

man.png

man.png

921 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

956 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

1076 ms

logo3.png

logo3.png

1153 ms

logo4.png

logo4.png

1194 ms

logo6.png

logo6.png

1200 ms

logo7.png

logo7.png

1326 ms

logo8.png

logo8.png

1386 ms

logo9.png

logo9.png

1429 ms

logo10.png

logo10.png

1437 ms

logo11.png

logo11.png

1441 ms

logo12.png

logo12.png

1575 ms

logo13.png

logo13.png

1619 ms

map.jpg

map.jpg

1608 ms

site-logo.png

site-logo.png

1607 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

1622 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

1752 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1846 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

1760 ms

slide-bg-1.jpg

slide-bg-1.jpg

1540 ms

testimonial-1.png

testimonial-1.png

1324 ms

testimonial-2.png

testimonial-2.png

1442 ms

testimonial-3.png

testimonial-3.png

1472 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

260 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

258 ms

Accessibility Review

rshtechnology.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rshtechnology.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rshtechnology.com SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rshtechnology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rshtechnology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rshtechnology.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RSH Technology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: