Tools & Wizards About Us
rsmt.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rsmt.in

Shop - RSMT Shop Online - rsmt.in

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

291 ms

Resources Loaded

10.4 sec

Page Rendered

67 ms

rsmt.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rsmt.in homepage info - get ready to check RSMT best content right away, or after learning these important things about rsmt.in

Visit rsmt.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rsmt.in page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 10.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rsmt.in performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rsmt.in

291 ms

rsmt.in

6865 ms

style.min.css

362 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

368 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

372 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Rsmt.in, 6% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wp.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Rsmt.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 697.4 kB (81%)

Content Size

856.2 kB

After Optimization

158.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rsmt.in main page is 856.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 683.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 32.4 kB
  • After minification 29.8 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 86.4 kB

  • Original 140.1 kB
  • After minification 138.9 kB
  • After compression 53.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.4 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 585.7 kB

  • Original 683.7 kB
  • After minification 661.4 kB
  • After compression 98.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rsmt.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 585.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (90%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

3

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RSMT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rsmt.in

rsmt.in

291 ms

rsmt.in

rsmt.in

6865 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

362 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

368 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

372 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

373 ms

wc-blocks-style.css

wc-blocks-style.css

825 ms

wpmenucart-icons.min.css

wpmenucart-icons.min.css

285 ms

wpmenucart-main.min.css

wpmenucart-main.min.css

367 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

372 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

556 ms

css

css

50 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

558 ms

mmenu-light.css

mmenu-light.css

375 ms

style.css

style.css

458 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

462 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

648 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

640 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

552 ms

s-202439.js

s-202439.js

24 ms

wpmenucart.min.js

wpmenucart.min.js

644 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

646 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

650 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

732 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

734 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

819 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

820 ms

customscript.js

customscript.js

822 ms

mmenu-light.min.js

mmenu-light.min.js

826 ms

e-202439.js

e-202439.js

23 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhPuI.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhPuI.ttf

24 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmPuI.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmPuI.ttf

32 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

103 ms

rsmt.in

rsmt.in

2288 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

93 ms

Accessibility Review

rsmt.in accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

rsmt.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rsmt.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rsmt.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rsmt.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rsmt.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RSMT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: