2.3 sec in total
18 ms
1.9 sec
429 ms
Welcome to rsprog.com homepage info - get ready to check Rsprog best content right away, or after learning these important things about rsprog.com
Programmer, Custom web application development by our expert web app developer. Front-end & design, backend, database, and server.
Visit rsprog.comWe analyzed Rsprog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
rsprog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value890 ms
32/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
18 ms
348 ms
95 ms
173 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rsprog.com, 57% (30 requests) were made to Robertsoft.com and 25% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (903 ms) relates to the external source Robertsoft.com.
Page size can be reduced by 118.0 kB (21%)
550.4 kB
432.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rsprog.com main page is 550.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 430.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.5 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.7 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rsprog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (76%)
42
10
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rsprog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rsprog.com
18 ms
robertsoft.com
348 ms
vendor.min.css
95 ms
MaterialDesign.css
173 ms
font-awesome.min.css
35 ms
uikit.css
268 ms
styles.css
311 ms
WebResource.axd
307 ms
MicrosoftAjax.js
322 ms
MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js
323 ms
angular.min.js
488 ms
ngTouch.min.js
365 ms
jquery.min.js
486 ms
js
132 ms
uikit.min.js
420 ms
slideshow.min.js
419 ms
slideshow-fx.min.js
420 ms
slider.min.js
420 ms
lightbox.min.js
465 ms
countUp.js
485 ms
jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js
486 ms
scripts.ang.js
546 ms
css
32 ms
1f5mfmue2
101 ms
page_2.webp
696 ms
logosm2.webp
293 ms
page_3.webp
536 ms
BodyWallpaper.webp
903 ms
widget.js
61 ms
page_4.webp
364 ms
page_6.webp
283 ms
Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff
250 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
297 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
53 ms
socicon.woff
265 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
226 ms
Roboto-Light-webfont.woff
307 ms
collect
125 ms
collect
52 ms
js
96 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
222 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
221 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
66 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
72 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
219 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
218 ms
twk-main.js
133 ms
twk-vendor.js
88 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
162 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
150 ms
twk-runtime.js
172 ms
twk-app.js
215 ms
rsprog.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rsprog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rsprog.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rsprog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rsprog.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rsprog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rsprog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: