Tools & Wizards About Us
rstom.kz screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

rstom.kz

Стоматология в Алматы, сеть стоматологических клиник "Рахат"

Page Load Speed

12.5 sec in total

First Response

724 ms

Resources Loaded

11.3 sec

Page Rendered

412 ms

rstom.kz screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rstom content for Kazakhstan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rstom.kz

Cтоматология Рахат Алматы, Астаны работает с 1993года. Стоматологи-терапевты, ортодонты, хирурги, имплантологи клиники имеют большой врачебный опыт и пользуется успехом у пациентов.

Visit rstom.kz

Key Findings

We analyzed Rstom.kz page load time and found that the first response time was 724 ms and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rstom.kz performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.089

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rstom.kz

724 ms

rstom.kz

3941 ms

www.rstom.kz

2356 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

236 ms

style.min.css

473 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rstom.kz and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Rstom.kz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 213.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rstom.kz main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 170.1 kB

  • Original 208.8 kB
  • After minification 201.5 kB
  • After compression 38.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rstom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 20.0 kB

  • Original 136.2 kB
  • After minification 136.2 kB
  • After compression 116.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 83.5 kB
  • After minification 83.5 kB
  • After compression 64.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rstom.kz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (44%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rstom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rstom.kz

rstom.kz

724 ms

rstom.kz

rstom.kz

3941 ms

www.rstom.kz

www.rstom.kz

2356 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

wp-customer-reviews.css

236 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

473 ms

styles.css

styles.css

705 ms

trp-floater-language-switcher.css

trp-floater-language-switcher.css

707 ms

trp-language-switcher.css

trp-language-switcher.css

720 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

720 ms

style.css

style.css

720 ms

reset.css

reset.css

831 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1174 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

941 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

958 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

959 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

961 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

1087 ms

jquery.formstyler.css

jquery.formstyler.css

1184 ms

jquery.formstyler.theme.css

jquery.formstyler.theme.css

1198 ms

style.css

style.css

1438 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

1200 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1606 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1407 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

1408 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

1678 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

1597 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

1639 ms

w-bullet.min.js

w-bullet.min.js

1641 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1673 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

1916 ms

jquery.formstyler.min.js

jquery.formstyler.min.js

1803 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

1872 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

1873 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

426 ms

pk-4.png

pk-4.png

904 ms

pk-1.png

pk-1.png

1032 ms

.png

.png

619 ms

ban1307.jpg

ban1307.jpg

854 ms

dban666.png

dban666.png

1379 ms

pop.png

pop.png

1385 ms

mob-3.png

mob-3.png

1553 ms

mob-1.png

mob-1.png

1788 ms

-1.png

-1.png

1142 ms

mban1307.jpg

mban1307.jpg

1270 ms

mban666.png

mban666.png

1619 ms

slide1-mob.jpeg

slide1-mob.jpeg

1509 ms

whatsapp-new.png

whatsapp-new.png

1617 ms

ru_RU.png

ru_RU.png

1623 ms

Calibri.woff

Calibri.woff

2113 ms

Calibri-Light.woff

Calibri-Light.woff

1913 ms

Calibri-Bold.woff

Calibri-Bold.woff

2220 ms

Frame-129-156x232.png

Frame-129-156x232.png

1471 ms

Frame-147-156x232.png

Frame-147-156x232.png

1474 ms

Frame-149-156x232.png

Frame-149-156x232.png

1633 ms

Frame-148-156x232.png

Frame-148-156x232.png

1710 ms

Frame-146-156x232.png

Frame-146-156x232.png

1712 ms

IMG_4047-156x232.jpg

IMG_4047-156x232.jpg

1869 ms

Frame-145-156x232.png

Frame-145-156x232.png

1871 ms

Frame-98-156x232.png

Frame-98-156x232.png

1965 ms

Frame-69-2-156x232.png

Frame-69-2-156x232.png

1965 ms

Frame-119-156x232.png

Frame-119-156x232.png

2077 ms

ic-2.png

ic-2.png

2103 ms

ic-3.svg

ic-3.svg

2104 ms

ic-1.svg

ic-1.svg

2183 ms

ic-4.svg

ic-4.svg

2185 ms

ic-5.svg

ic-5.svg

2190 ms

ic-6.svg

ic-6.svg

2315 ms

gen-dir.jpg

gen-dir.jpg

2336 ms

footer-copy.png

footer-copy.png

2304 ms

kz-18x9.png

kz-18x9.png

2380 ms

Accessibility Review

rstom.kz accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

rstom.kz best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rstom.kz SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rstom.kz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rstom.kz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rstom.kz

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rstom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: