Tools & Wizards About Us
rswww.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

rswww.com

Industrial Solutions & Electrical Components | RS

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

309 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

rswww.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rswww.com now to see the best up-to-date RS Www content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rswww.com

RS is the leading provider of industrial and electronic solutions. Secure online ordering, same-day dispatch & free delivery available.

Visit rswww.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rswww.com page load time and found that the first response time was 309 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rswww.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,620 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rswww.com

309 ms

543 ms

jquery-1.5.js

13 ms

common.js

11 ms

scripts.js

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rswww.com, 51% (45 requests) were made to Img-europe.electrocomponents.com and 18% (16 requests) were made to Uk.rs-online.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (543 ms) relates to the external source Uk.rs-online.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (61%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

650.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rswww.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 732.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 122.2 kB

  • Original 146.0 kB
  • After minification 115.3 kB
  • After compression 23.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.7 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 408.7 kB
  • After minification 370.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RS Www images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 525.4 kB

  • Original 732.5 kB
  • After minification 632.1 kB
  • After compression 207.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 525.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 337.5 kB

  • Original 386.4 kB
  • After minification 310.4 kB
  • After compression 48.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rswww.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 337.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (46%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

45

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RS Www. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rswww.com

rswww.com

309 ms

543 ms

jquery-1.5.js

jquery-1.5.js

13 ms

common.js

common.js

11 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

23 ms

mtagconfig.js

mtagconfig.js

24 ms

main.css

main.css

25 ms

cataloguePredictiveSearch.js

cataloguePredictiveSearch.js

24 ms

subModal.js

subModal.js

35 ms

Bootstrap.js

Bootstrap.js

35 ms

jquery.min.1.11.0.js

jquery.min.1.11.0.js

141 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

152 ms

rs-home.css

rs-home.css

161 ms

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

151 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

138 ms

hp.css

hp.css

160 ms

hp-additional.css

hp-additional.css

164 ms

target.js

target.js

9 ms

ajax

ajax

18 ms

serverComponent.php

serverComponent.php

55 ms

confirmit_rsc_custom_1.3.1.min.css

confirmit_rsc_custom_1.3.1.min.css

155 ms

confirmit_rsc_langs-1.3.1.js

confirmit_rsc_langs-1.3.1.js

155 ms

confirmit_rsc_custom-1.3.1.js

confirmit_rsc_custom-1.3.1.js

155 ms

ga.js

ga.js

42 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

97 ms

InstructionIcon.gif

InstructionIcon.gif

40 ms

201603_herobanner_special.jpg

201603_herobanner_special.jpg

76 ms

new_english.jpg

new_english.jpg

72 ms

201603_herobanner_usb_c_te.jpg

201603_herobanner_usb_c_te.jpg

71 ms

201603_herobanner_health_and_safety.jpg

201603_herobanner_health_and_safety.jpg

75 ms

201603_herobanner_rs_wifi_microscope.jpg

201603_herobanner_rs_wifi_microscope.jpg

74 ms

201603_herobanner_slide_uk-fm.jpg

201603_herobanner_slide_uk-fm.jpg

77 ms

201603_secondary_rs_pro.jpg

201603_secondary_rs_pro.jpg

75 ms

201603_secondary_o_and_d_rt_save.jpg

201603_secondary_o_and_d_rt_save.jpg

75 ms

201603_bannersmall_block_uk-automation.jpg

201603_bannersmall_block_uk-automation.jpg

101 ms

201603_npi_1_delay_relay.jpg

201603_npi_1_delay_relay.jpg

75 ms

rs-logo.jpg

rs-logo.jpg

75 ms

201603_npi_2_quectel_board.jpg

201603_npi_2_quectel_board.jpg

75 ms

quectel_logo.jpg

quectel_logo.jpg

79 ms

201603_npi_3_infineon_xmc1100.jpg

201603_npi_3_infineon_xmc1100.jpg

75 ms

infineon_logo.jpg

infineon_logo.jpg

75 ms

201603_npi_4_testo_probe.jpg

201603_npi_4_testo_probe.jpg

76 ms

testo_logo.jpg

testo_logo.jpg

76 ms

201603_npi_5_rs_screws.jpg

201603_npi_5_rs_screws.jpg

76 ms

201603_npi_6_rs_voltmeter.jpg

201603_npi_6_rs_voltmeter.jpg

76 ms

r8806755.jpg

r8806755.jpg

93 ms

electronics_npi_8.jpg

electronics_npi_8.jpg

94 ms

facom_sls_npi_9.jpg

facom_sls_npi_9.jpg

94 ms

facom-logo.jpg

facom-logo.jpg

95 ms

logo-designspark.gif

logo-designspark.gif

94 ms

201603_rpi2.jpg

201603_rpi2.jpg

96 ms

201603_lorawan.jpg

201603_lorawan.jpg

96 ms

201603_nfc.jpg

201603_nfc.jpg

96 ms

uk.gif

uk.gif

95 ms

twitter_square.gif

twitter_square.gif

97 ms

globalSprite.png

globalSprite.png

55 ms

ajaxLoaderSmall.gif

ajaxLoaderSmall.gif

30 ms

orderCartBG.gif

orderCartBG.gif

31 ms

gradSprite.png

gradSprite.png

31 ms

track.gif

track.gif

30 ms

paymentOptions.gif

paymentOptions.gif

34 ms

c6c476263dc3ac3c34db7dfa5832adec.js

c6c476263dc3ac3c34db7dfa5832adec.js

27 ms

3460470f6f6fc65e409ffb2d576ccdc6.js

3460470f6f6fc65e409ffb2d576ccdc6.js

50 ms

06cb2c71f031917af86e25cf3c618b53.js

06cb2c71f031917af86e25cf3c618b53.js

58 ms

57bae171460953343e75567eca912184.js

57bae171460953343e75567eca912184.js

55 ms

9827ce34502816534804750b2e7e79f9.js

9827ce34502816534804750b2e7e79f9.js

55 ms

d9e9a953a34d352a0f18aed89c8704e8.js

d9e9a953a34d352a0f18aed89c8704e8.js

54 ms

ffff59dd9edcd398e9c42d14c5a2d387.js

ffff59dd9edcd398e9c42d14c5a2d387.js

57 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

65 ms

youtube_square.gif

youtube_square.gif

61 ms

googleplus_square.gif

googleplus_square.gif

49 ms

css

css

70 ms

service_sea_industrial_application.jpg

service_sea_industrial_application.jpg

52 ms

free_delivery_uk_1.jpg

free_delivery_uk_1.jpg

41 ms

service-banner_help-uk.jpg

service-banner_help-uk.jpg

49 ms

service-banner_quotes-uk.jpg

service-banner_quotes-uk.jpg

47 ms

service-banner_events-uk.jpg

service-banner_events-uk.jpg

46 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

86 ms

collect

collect

127 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

12 ms

iconSprite.png

iconSprite.png

37 ms

gradBgSprite.png

gradBgSprite.png

35 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

42 ms

confirmitimg_close.png

confirmitimg_close.png

36 ms

36 ms

37 ms

deploy.asp

deploy.asp

192 ms

maskBG.png

maskBG.png

20 ms

Accessibility Review

rswww.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rswww.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rswww.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rswww.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rswww.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rswww.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RS Www. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: