Tools & Wizards About Us
rtcdirect.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

rtcdirect.net

RTC Direct Mailing | Mail Marketing | Shoemakersville, PA

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

418 ms

rtcdirect.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rtcdirect.net homepage info - get ready to check RTC Direct best content right away, or after learning these important things about rtcdirect.net

Providing Quality Design & Marketing Services Since 1982 – At RTC Direct Mailing, get more than just mailing services — Quality print, design, & direct mailing products

Visit rtcdirect.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtcdirect.net page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtcdirect.net performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value21,920 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.216

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rtcdirect.net

205 ms

reusablec-block.css

56 ms

font-awesome.min.css

84 ms

flexslider.css

124 ms

recent_widget.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Rtcdirect.net, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (699 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 160.0 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rtcdirect.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 724.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 87.4 kB

  • Original 106.5 kB
  • After minification 105.0 kB
  • After compression 19.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 724.1 kB
  • After minification 724.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTC Direct images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 66.2 kB

  • Original 345.5 kB
  • After minification 345.5 kB
  • After compression 279.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 222.3 kB
  • After minification 221.5 kB
  • After compression 215.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtcdirect.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (79%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTC Direct. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rtcdirect.net

www.rtcdirect.net

205 ms

reusablec-block.css

reusablec-block.css

56 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

84 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

124 ms

recent_widget.css

recent_widget.css

126 ms

chosen.min.css

chosen.min.css

123 ms

critical.css

critical.css

105 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

119 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

124 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

141 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

165 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

168 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

165 ms

js_composer_front_custom.css

js_composer_front_custom.css

220 ms

css

css

76 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

191 ms

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

162 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

179 ms

back-compat.min.css

back-compat.min.css

175 ms

custom.css

custom.css

243 ms

media.css

media.css

178 ms

mega-menu.css

mega-menu.css

234 ms

style.css

style.css

235 ms

fa.css

fa.css

254 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

262 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

258 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

252 ms

chosen.jquery.js

chosen.jquery.js

257 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

258 ms

SocialShare.js

SocialShare.js

363 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

365 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

368 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

371 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

380 ms

js

js

109 ms

swap.js

swap.js

142 ms

n2-j.min.js

n2-j.min.js

414 ms

nextend-gsap.min.js

nextend-gsap.min.js

410 ms

nextend-frontend.min.js

nextend-frontend.min.js

407 ms

stripes.css

stripes.css

402 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

441 ms

smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js

smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js

403 ms

nextend-webfontloader.min.js

nextend-webfontloader.min.js

385 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

374 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

366 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

366 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

366 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

367 ms

legacy.min.js

legacy.min.js

329 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

327 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

326 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

113 ms

js

js

76 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

121 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwQ.woff

149 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkW-EH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkW-EH7alwQ.woff

684 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkYODH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkYODH7alwQ.woff

684 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwQ.woff

684 ms

css

css

121 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

617 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

616 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

616 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

617 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

617 ms

collect

collect

542 ms

RTC_logo_Normal3.png

RTC_logo_Normal3.png

586 ms

embed

embed

699 ms

payment-300x46.png

payment-300x46.png

632 ms

RTC_logo_XSmall3_mobileHD_@2x.png

RTC_logo_XSmall3_mobileHD_@2x.png

561 ms

bigstock-Graphic-Designers-Choose-Color-251004058.jpg

bigstock-Graphic-Designers-Choose-Color-251004058.jpg

610 ms

printing-main.jpg

printing-main.jpg

610 ms

bigstock-Composition-With-White-And-Yel-261896935.jpg

bigstock-Composition-With-White-And-Yel-261896935.jpg

562 ms

mail-pile-blue.jpg

mail-pile-blue.jpg

561 ms

facebook-icon-300x300.png

facebook-icon-300x300.png

560 ms

collect

collect

122 ms

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

59 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

30 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

138 ms

u-4V0qWljRw-Pd815fNqc8T_wAFcX-c37MPiNYlWniJ2hJXHx_KVxUbp.woff

u-4V0qWljRw-Pd815fNqc8T_wAFcX-c37MPiNYlWniJ2hJXHx_KVxUbp.woff

28 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

88 ms

js

js

35 ms

Accessibility Review

rtcdirect.net accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rtcdirect.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rtcdirect.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtcdirect.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtcdirect.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtcdirect.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RTC Direct. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: