1.7 sec in total
113 ms
1.3 sec
315 ms
Visit rtcol.com now to see the best up-to-date Rtcol content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtcol.com
Visit rtcol.comWe analyzed Rtcol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
rtcol.com performance score
113 ms
468 ms
32 ms
98 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rtcol.com, 86% (65 requests) were made to Rtc1.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (468 ms) relates to the external source Rtc1.com.
Page size can be reduced by 721.2 kB (43%)
1.7 MB
941.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rtcol.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 761.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rtcol images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 336.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 336.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 273.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtcol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 273.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (61%)
71
28
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtcol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rtcol.com
113 ms
www.rtc1.com
468 ms
style.css
32 ms
dashicons.min.css
98 ms
wunderground.css
62 ms
width-calculators.php
166 ms
front.css
63 ms
weptile-image-slider-widget.css
64 ms
nivo-slider.css
66 ms
jetpack.css
94 ms
slidedeck.css
102 ms
jquery.js
136 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
99 ms
include.js
123 ms
core.min.js
126 ms
widget.min.js
130 ms
position.min.js
133 ms
menu.min.js
154 ms
autocomplete.min.js
156 ms
widget.min.js
162 ms
tabs.min.js
165 ms
reflection.js
166 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
187 ms
jquery-ui-tabs-rotate.js
192 ms
global.js
197 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
197 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
197 ms
slidedeck.jquery.js
215 ms
slidedeck-public.js
260 ms
widgets.js
127 ms
shailan-dropdown.min.css
222 ms
color-scheme.css
226 ms
main.css
234 ms
dfcg-jq-script.min.js
227 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
245 ms
custom-responsive.css
253 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
255 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
3 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
wpgroho.js
257 ms
style.css
244 ms
wp-embed.min.js
222 ms
reset.css
32 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
77 ms
ga.js
66 ms
RTC-Header-Words.jpg
219 ms
PickItMarch2.jpg
188 ms
PolycomFrontpage.jpg
191 ms
NewChannelLineup.jpg
192 ms
email-tutorials.jpg
191 ms
RTCTV-580-Front-01.jpg
190 ms
tripleplay-sq.jpg
191 ms
watchvideo.jpg
221 ms
howdoi-FAQ.gif
222 ms
wtve1.gif
219 ms
Channel4.png
221 ms
rtc-directory01-Top.jpg
256 ms
athome.gif
255 ms
811.gif
255 ms
v2e-banner-sq.jpg
255 ms
tech_support.jpg
256 ms
header_short.jpg
257 ms
AW2C.gif
279 ms
EBill2.jpg
280 ms
EBill5.gif
280 ms
border-stripe.png
282 ms
nt_clear.gif
284 ms
wundergroundLogo_4c_horz.png
284 ms
__utm.gif
164 ms
VerbLight-webfont.woff
258 ms
VerbRegular-webfont.woff
264 ms
6nvU963vW96zvuZHXyGvkNfLa8try2vLa8try2vLa8try2vLaPbzi90vRj6IfRT+KfhS9KHpR9KLoRdGLohdFL4peFL0oelH0ouhF0YuiF0Uvil4UvSh6UfSi6EXRi6IXRS+KXhS9KHpR9KHoQ9GHog9FH4o+FD0oelD0oOToN3TgiAFDRg4b9C8VmLmgAAAAAVWwJZkAAA==
3 ms
hovercard.css
32 ms
services.css
59 ms
g.gif
4 ms
rtcol.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtcol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtcol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtcol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rtcol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: