Tools & Wizards About Us
rtcweb.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 81% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

rtcweb.in

Custom WebRTC Web & Mobile App Development Services- RTCWeb.in

Page Load Speed

8.9 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

6.3 sec

Page Rendered

639 ms

rtcweb.in screenshot

About Website

Visit rtcweb.in now to see the best up-to-date RTCWeb content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtcweb.in

We provide scalable webrtc based web & mobile app development services. Video conferencing & chat app solutions, hybrid app development & consultation services. Hire RTCWeb now!

Visit rtcweb.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtcweb.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtcweb.in performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,930 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.245

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rtcweb.in

1982 ms

gtm.js

84 ms

8997340.js

52 ms

style.min.css

148 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

287 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Rtcweb.in, 5% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rtcweb.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 267.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rtcweb.in main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 59.6 kB

  • Original 75.0 kB
  • After minification 61.2 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 60.6 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTCWeb images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 14.3 kB

  • Original 498.0 kB
  • After minification 498.0 kB
  • After compression 483.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 133.4 kB

  • Original 207.1 kB
  • After minification 207.1 kB
  • After compression 73.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtcweb.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (64%)

Requests Now

103

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTCWeb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rtcweb.in

rtcweb.in

1982 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

84 ms

8997340.js

8997340.js

52 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

148 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

287 ms

styles.css

styles.css

288 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

353 ms

top-slider.css

top-slider.css

338 ms

slider.css

slider.css

324 ms

all.css

all.css

339 ms

floating-label.css

floating-label.css

340 ms

aos.css

aos.css

335 ms

custom.css

custom.css

360 ms

style.css

style.css

442 ms

custom_home.css

custom_home.css

432 ms

all.css

all.css

433 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

502 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

446 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

431 ms

page-preloader.js

page-preloader.js

564 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

563 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

578 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

563 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

565 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

577 ms

classie.js

classie.js

602 ms

slick.js

slick.js

604 ms

top-slider.js

top-slider.js

601 ms

aos.js

aos.js

632 ms

bioep.js

bioep.js

663 ms

api.js

api.js

39 ms

referer.js

referer.js

664 ms

custom.js

custom.js

673 ms

api.js

api.js

131 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

675 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

737 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

738 ms

index.js

index.js

809 ms

8997340.js

8997340.js

116 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

146 ms

fb.js

fb.js

116 ms

8997340.js

8997340.js

233 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

96 ms

js

js

83 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

50 ms

qevents.js

qevents.js

66 ms

pixel

pixel

38 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

149 ms

destination

destination

151 ms

collect

collect

94 ms

collect

collect

10 ms

collect

collect

78 ms

insight.old.min.js

insight.old.min.js

38 ms

41 ms

59 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

16 ms

rtc-logo-white.png

rtc-logo-white.png

281 ms

icon-phone.svg

icon-phone.svg

283 ms

phone-purple.svg

phone-purple.svg

285 ms

bg-top.jpg

bg-top.jpg

367 ms

001.png

001.png

399 ms

002.png

002.png

400 ms

003.png

003.png

402 ms

004.png

004.png

464 ms

logo-mediagroup.png

logo-mediagroup.png

365 ms

janus-logo.png

janus-logo.png

368 ms

logo-vonage.png

logo-vonage.png

399 ms

logo-tokbox.png

logo-tokbox.png

432 ms

logo-wowza.png

logo-wowza.png

436 ms

logo-agora.png

logo-agora.png

438 ms

logo-vidyo.png

logo-vidyo.png

470 ms

logo-twillo.png

logo-twillo.png

472 ms

logo-frozen.png

logo-frozen.png

513 ms

logo-jitsi.png

logo-jitsi.png

513 ms

bg-curve.png

bg-curve.png

482 ms

card-img1.png

card-img1.png

566 ms

card-img2.png

card-img2.png

511 ms

card-img3.png

card-img3.png

509 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

69 ms

ti.js

ti.js

96 ms

ssw8chxv43wk.js

ssw8chxv43wk.js

113 ms

lftracker_v1_YEgkB8lZJkp4ep3Z.js

lftracker_v1_YEgkB8lZJkp4ep3Z.js

454 ms

49b2kb9mci

49b2kb9mci

106 ms

t.min.js

t.min.js

778 ms

AvenirNext-Regular.otf

AvenirNext-Regular.otf

626 ms

AvenirNext-Bold.otf

AvenirNext-Bold.otf

634 ms

AvenirNext-DemiBold-03.otf

AvenirNext-DemiBold-03.otf

562 ms

AvenirNext-Medium.otf

AvenirNext-Medium.otf

586 ms

card-img7.png

card-img7.png

608 ms

img-skoodio.jpg

img-skoodio.jpg

589 ms

img-business.jpg

img-business.jpg

597 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

27 ms

img-aws.jpg

img-aws.jpg

606 ms

img-wpf.jpg

img-wpf.jpg

603 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

63 ms

img-experties.png

img-experties.png

651 ms

tick.png

tick.png

595 ms

img-quote.png

img-quote.png

515 ms

collect

collect

8 ms

bg-contactus.jpg

bg-contactus.jpg

492 ms

icon-location.svg

icon-location.svg

538 ms

icon-phone-lg.svg

icon-phone-lg.svg

537 ms

logo-rtc-lg.svg

logo-rtc-lg.svg

538 ms

logo-gwl.png

logo-gwl.png

536 ms

collect

collect

6 ms

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

38 ms

pixel

pixel

5 ms

c.gif

c.gif

8 ms

Accessibility Review

rtcweb.in accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rtcweb.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rtcweb.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtcweb.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtcweb.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtcweb.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RTCWeb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: