10.8 sec in total
534 ms
9.9 sec
314 ms
Visit rtdaccounting.com now to see the best up-to-date RTD Accounting content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtdaccounting.com
A satisfied customer is our business strategy More About UsGet A Service A satisfied customer is our business strategy More About UsGet A Service SPAIN IN DUBAI WITH RTD CONSULTANCY At RTD Consultancy...
Visit rtdaccounting.comWe analyzed Rtdaccounting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 534 ms and then it took 10.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
rtdaccounting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value23.1 s
0/100
10%
Value3,100 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
534 ms
3280 ms
236 ms
481 ms
718 ms
Our browser made a total of 142 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (113 requests) were addressed to the original Rtdaccounting.com, 8% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rtdaccounting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 173.7 kB (7%)
2.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rtdaccounting.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 149.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTD Accounting images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtdaccounting.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 94 (75%)
125
31
The browser has sent 125 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTD Accounting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rtdaccounting.com
534 ms
rtdaccounting.com
3280 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
236 ms
chaty-front.min.css
481 ms
style.min.css
718 ms
classic-themes.min.css
722 ms
styles.css
721 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
720 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
728 ms
dustar-elementor.css
727 ms
slick.css
949 ms
slick-theme.css
955 ms
venobox.css
958 ms
flaticon.css
956 ms
themify-icons.css
969 ms
flaticon.css
969 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1186 ms
animate.css
1193 ms
owl.carousel.css
1195 ms
owl.theme.css
1197 ms
slick.css
1209 ms
owl.transitions.css
1208 ms
fancybox.css
1419 ms
styles.css
1431 ms
style.css
1427 ms
odometer.css
1430 ms
swiper.min.css
1448 ms
elements.css
1451 ms
css
33 ms
responsive.css
1651 ms
style.css
1662 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1665 ms
animations.min.css
1666 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
1687 ms
frontend.min.css
1694 ms
post-393.css
1882 ms
post-1248.css
1896 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
1900 ms
css
35 ms
js
70 ms
api.js
82 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
1897 ms
dashicons.min.css
1700 ms
rtmedia.min.css
1462 ms
rtm-upload-terms.min.css
1402 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1420 ms
solid.min.css
1424 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
1430 ms
jquery.min.js
1453 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1462 ms
cht-front-script.min.js
1405 ms
moxie.min.js
1425 ms
plupload.min.js
1431 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
1429 ms
underscore.min.js
1555 ms
backbone.min.js
1555 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1395 ms
rtmedia.min.js
1421 ms
rtMedia.backbone.js
1891 ms
scripts.js
1423 ms
plugin-scripts.js
1540 ms
script.js
1541 ms
slick.min.js
1402 ms
venobox.min.js
1426 ms
wpgs.js
1421 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1534 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1522 ms
isotope.min.js
1599 ms
fancybox.min.js
1449 ms
masonry.min.js
1439 ms
owl-carousel.js
1545 ms
jquery-easing.js
1546 ms
wow.min.js
1597 ms
odometer.min.js
1623 ms
magnific-popup.js
1439 ms
slick-slider.js
1427 ms
swiper.min.js
1556 ms
wc-quantity-increment.js
1549 ms
scripts.js
1589 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1699 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1526 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1504 ms
dwf.js
1549 ms
forms.min.js
1552 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1569 ms
core.min.js
1605 ms
dialog.min.js
1446 ms
waypoints.min.js
1418 ms
fbevents.js
136 ms
why-choose-bg.jpg
334 ms
3647f68fa5879ae69756f07b48c5bed2
166 ms
share-link.min.js
1529 ms
testimonials-bg-min.png
358 ms
frontend.min.js
1534 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e2fwniDhzA.ttf
99 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFn8kEk30e2fwniDhzA.ttf
142 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e2fwniDhzA.ttf
171 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOkEk30e2fwniDhzA.ttf
184 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e2fwniDhzA.ttf
182 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e2fwniDhzA.ttf
285 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOl0k30e2fwniDhzA.ttf
183 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k30e2fwniDhzA.ttf
207 ms
dustar-elementor.js
1466 ms
themify.woff
2210 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1911 ms
output-onlinepngtools-2.png
1562 ms
about-1.jpg
1799 ms
why-choose-bg.jpg
1226 ms
about-2.jpg
1675 ms
p5.jpg
1704 ms
testimonials-bg-min.png
1416 ms
p4.jpg
1467 ms
p3.jpg
1897 ms
p2.jpg
1808 ms
p1.jpg
1694 ms
testi-1-min.jpg
1716 ms
fondo-azul2.jpg
1925 ms
recaptcha__en.js
28 ms
imagen-roseta.jpg
2042 ms
fondo-puntos.png
1802 ms
empleada-001.jpg
2047 ms
empleado-01.jpg
1992 ms
RTD-ACCOUNTING-imagen.jpg
1999 ms
securintec-me-logo.jpg
1858 ms
securintec-logo.jpg
1892 ms
nervion-industries-logo.jpg
2057 ms
emypro-mpec-logo.jpg
2058 ms
control-desing-metal-parts-logo.jpg
1930 ms
suanfarma-logo.jpg
1977 ms
footer-bg.jpg
2045 ms
slider-0003-home-rtd.jpg
2279 ms
slider-0004-home-rtd.jpg
2460 ms
anchor
131 ms
styles__ltr.css
53 ms
recaptcha__en.js
55 ms
IDLZ5bdCrEGdGR5FKKZfiIWvV7rMSlbAHUEzxUIOBQg.js
36 ms
webworker.js
72 ms
logo_48.png
23 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
35 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
36 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
36 ms
recaptcha__en.js
32 ms
rtdaccounting.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
<object> elements do not have alternate text
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rtdaccounting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rtdaccounting.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtdaccounting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtdaccounting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtdaccounting.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RTD Accounting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: