Tools & Wizards About Us
rthomasmurphy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

rthomasmurphy.com

RThomasMurphy.com – Attorneys at Law

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

838 ms

Page Rendered

225 ms

rthomasmurphy.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rthomasmurphy.com now to see the best up-to-date R Thomas Murphy content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rthomasmurphy.com

Visit rthomasmurphy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rthomasmurphy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rthomasmurphy.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.227

55/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rthomasmurphy.com

70 ms

rthomasmurphy.com

119 ms

analytics.js

31 ms

css

45 ms

global.css

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rthomasmurphy.com, 20% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (439 ms) belongs to the original domain Rthomasmurphy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 42.7 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rthomasmurphy.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 845.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 26.6 kB

  • Original 34.1 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 845.8 kB
  • After minification 845.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R Thomas Murphy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 114.8 kB
  • After minification 114.8 kB
  • After compression 103.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 52.5 kB
  • After compression 47.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rthomasmurphy.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (80%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R Thomas Murphy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rthomasmurphy.com

rthomasmurphy.com

70 ms

rthomasmurphy.com

rthomasmurphy.com

119 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

31 ms

css

css

45 ms

global.css

global.css

19 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

184 ms

styles.css

styles.css

43 ms

style.css

style.css

176 ms

css

css

48 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

44 ms

component.css

component.css

97 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

106 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

46 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

53 ms

style-responsive.css

style-responsive.css

66 ms

style-custom.css

style-custom.css

72 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

80 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

86 ms

circle-progress.js

circle-progress.js

98 ms

global.js

global.js

106 ms

a1548a6a971efa9f7c2124e.js

a1548a6a971efa9f7c2124e.js

23 ms

index.js

index.js

107 ms

index.js

index.js

112 ms

gdlr-lawyer.js

gdlr-lawyer.js

214 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

142 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

216 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

141 ms

jquery.dlmenu.js

jquery.dlmenu.js

142 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

142 ms

jquery.transit.min.js

jquery.transit.min.js

150 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

157 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

168 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

177 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

212 ms

gdlr-script.js

gdlr-script.js

263 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

js

js

65 ms

RMurphy.png

RMurphy.png

22 ms

ElderLaw.jpg

ElderLaw.jpg

306 ms

backgroundSite.jpg

backgroundSite.jpg

439 ms

logo2.jpg

logo2.jpg

21 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

28 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff

50 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

79 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

57 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

81 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

80 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

79 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

55 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

81 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

80 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

37 ms

Accessibility Review

rthomasmurphy.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rthomasmurphy.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rthomasmurphy.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rthomasmurphy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rthomasmurphy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rthomasmurphy.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of R Thomas Murphy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: