Tools & Wizards About Us
rtijsr.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

rtijsr.com

Rashtriya Technical Institute - Best Technical Institute in Jamshedpur

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

398 ms

rtijsr.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rtijsr.com homepage info - get ready to check Rtijsr best content right away, or after learning these important things about rtijsr.com

Best technical institute in Jamshedpur for courses as Technical courses, Operating courses, safety course, welding course and computer course. Call us today

Visit rtijsr.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtijsr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtijsr.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.7 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rtijsr.com

1278 ms

js

74 ms

style.min.css

249 ms

mainstyles.css

461 ms

styles.css

461 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Rtijsr.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rtijsr.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.6 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rtijsr.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 70.2 kB

  • Original 89.7 kB
  • After minification 82.7 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 26.9 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rtijsr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 215.2 kB
  • After minification 215.2 kB
  • After compression 213.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 77.9 kB
  • After minification 77.9 kB
  • After compression 72.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtijsr.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (56%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtijsr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rtijsr.com

rtijsr.com

1278 ms

js

js

74 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

249 ms

mainstyles.css

mainstyles.css

461 ms

styles.css

styles.css

461 ms

css

css

46 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

481 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

472 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

50 ms

color.css

color.css

479 ms

style.css

style.css

488 ms

custom.css

custom.css

686 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

688 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

703 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

705 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

709 ms

app.js

app.js

819 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

912 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

914 ms

index.js

index.js

933 ms

index.js

index.js

936 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

939 ms

functions.js

functions.js

956 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1141 ms

jquery.wow.min.js

jquery.wow.min.js

1140 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1165 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1170 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

1170 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1189 ms

jquery.validate.bootstrap.popover.min.js

jquery.validate.bootstrap.popover.min.js

1367 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

1370 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1396 ms

css

css

17 ms

launcher.js

launcher.js

119 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

668 ms

bg-banner.jpg

bg-banner.jpg

1126 ms

banner01.jpg

banner01.jpg

913 ms

banner02.jpg

banner02.jpg

1076 ms

banner03.jpg

banner03.jpg

1079 ms

4-4.jpg

4-4.jpg

1343 ms

KK-2.jpg

KK-2.jpg

1352 ms

mid-img.jpg

mid-img.jpg

1148 ms

tick.png

tick.png

1305 ms

bg-b1.jpg

bg-b1.jpg

1309 ms

icon1.png

icon1.png

1362 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

1382 ms

icon2.png

icon2.png

1534 ms

icon4.png

icon4.png

1535 ms

top-footer-bg.jpg

top-footer-bg.jpg

1804 ms

logo1-1.png

logo1-1.png

1584 ms

logo4.png

logo4.png

1597 ms

logo3.png

logo3.png

1617 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

1762 ms

whatsapp-icon-square.svg

whatsapp-icon-square.svg

1691 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcABrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcABrE.ttf

29 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf

30 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

29 ms

P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY-ERCrDfQM.ttf

P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY-ERCrDfQM.ttf

53 ms

P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY9jQyrDfQM.ttf

P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY9jQyrDfQM.ttf

54 ms

close-icon.png

close-icon.png

1743 ms

5c0e8632e23f73556fce6fae

5c0e8632e23f73556fce6fae

116 ms

details

details

207 ms

minified.js

minified.js

33 ms

widget.js

widget.js

31 ms

5c0e84f8e23f73556fce6fa9-5c0e8632e23f73556fce6fae.jpg

5c0e84f8e23f73556fce6fa9-5c0e8632e23f73556fce6fae.jpg

114 ms

Accessibility Review

rtijsr.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rtijsr.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rtijsr.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtijsr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtijsr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtijsr.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rtijsr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: