11.1 sec in total
3.6 sec
7.1 sec
450 ms
Welcome to rtijsr.com homepage info - get ready to check Rtijsr best content right away, or after learning these important things about rtijsr.com
Best technical institute in Jamshedpur for courses as Technical courses, Operating courses, safety course, welding course and computer course. Call us today
Visit rtijsr.comWe analyzed Rtijsr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.6 sec and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
rtijsr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value16.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value5,990 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.171
70/100
15%
Value21.3 s
1/100
10%
3554 ms
126 ms
384 ms
524 ms
496 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Rtijsr.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rtijsr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 100.9 kB (5%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Rtijsr.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rtijsr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtijsr.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (59%)
63
26
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtijsr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rtijsr.com
3554 ms
js
126 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
384 ms
style.min.css
524 ms
mainstyles.css
496 ms
styles.css
475 ms
css
94 ms
genericons.css
501 ms
bootstrap.css
555 ms
font-awesome.min.css
88 ms
color.css
792 ms
style.css
711 ms
custom.css
729 ms
animate.min.css
756 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
760 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
799 ms
jquery.min.js
959 ms
app.js
1407 ms
index.js
1408 ms
index.js
1409 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1468 ms
functions.js
1432 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1472 ms
jquery.wow.min.js
1467 ms
wow.min.js
1467 ms
waypoints.min.js
1494 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
1466 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1823 ms
jquery.validate.bootstrap.popover.min.js
1683 ms
additional-methods.min.js
1710 ms
custom.js
1681 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
destination
56 ms
collect
39 ms
conversion_async.js
62 ms
loader.js
50 ms
call-tracking_7.js
10 ms
wcm
61 ms
css
22 ms
launcher.js
473 ms
logo1.png
508 ms
bg-banner.jpg
1245 ms
banner01.jpg
998 ms
banner02.jpg
1006 ms
banner03.jpg
1006 ms
4-4.jpg
1277 ms
KK-2.jpg
2268 ms
mid-img.jpg
1451 ms
tick.png
1230 ms
bg-b1.jpg
1473 ms
icon1.png
1457 ms
icon3.png
1423 ms
icon2.png
1466 ms
icon4.png
1621 ms
top-footer-bg.jpg
2304 ms
logo1-1.png
1660 ms
logo4.png
1654 ms
logo3.png
1707 ms
logo2.png
1843 ms
whatsapp-icon-square.svg
1886 ms
close-icon.png
1891 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
66 ms
5c0e8632e23f73556fce6fae
133 ms
details
46 ms
minified.js
180 ms
widget.js
123 ms
5c0e84f8e23f73556fce6fa9-5c0e8632e23f73556fce6fae.jpg
273 ms
rtijsr.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rtijsr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rtijsr.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtijsr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtijsr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtijsr.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rtijsr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: