Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

rtls.uk.com

RTLS Communications – Healthcare Call Systems (No1 for Quality)

Page Load Speed

410 ms in total

First Response

180 ms

Resources Loaded

181 ms

Page Rendered

49 ms

rtls.uk.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rtls.uk.com now to see the best up-to-date RTLS content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtls.uk.com

Healthcare Communication Specialists for Nurse Call, Wireless Staff Attack & Panic Alarms, Pager Systems, Lone Worker and WC Alarms.

Visit rtls.uk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtls.uk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 230 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtls.uk.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.319

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rtls.uk.com

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rtls.uk.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (180 ms) belongs to the original domain Rtls.uk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 26 B (0%)

Content Size

94.2 kB

After Optimization

94.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Rtls.uk.com main page is 94.2 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 94.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 23 B

  • Original 177 B
  • After minification 177 B
  • After compression 154 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23 B or 13% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 94.1 kB
  • After minification 94.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTLS images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

rtls.uk.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rtls.uk.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rtls.uk.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtls.uk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rtls.uk.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RTLS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: