2.3 sec in total
26 ms
1.4 sec
895 ms
Welcome to rtp.pt homepage info - get ready to check RTP best content for Portugal right away, or after learning these important things about rtp.pt
A RTP está próxima dos portugueses. Os programas que vê todos os dias na TV e na Rádio. Os vídeos e áudios dos seus programas preferidos, mp3, rss e online. Notícias, desporto, blogues, sugestões e as...
Visit rtp.ptWe analyzed Rtp.pt page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
rtp.pt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value4.2 s
85/100
10%
26 ms
27 ms
189 ms
20 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Rtp.pt, 55% (46 requests) were made to Cdn-images.rtp.pt and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (658 ms) relates to the external source Gapt.hit.gemius.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 122.7 kB (3%)
4.5 MB
4.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Rtp.pt main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 24.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 233 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtp.pt has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (22%)
79
62
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rtp.pt
26 ms
27 ms
js
189 ms
style-new.css
20 ms
rtp-require.js
16 ms
homepage.nd.min.js
15 ms
dfp.js
406 ms
analytics.js
398 ms
css
62 ms
rtp.png
302 ms
containr.js
392 ms
phpThumb.php
432 ms
icon-search.svg
246 ms
social-icon-facebook.svg
242 ms
social-icon-twitter.svg
301 ms
social-icon-instagram.svg
303 ms
social-icon-youtube.svg
311 ms
social-icon-flickr.svg
309 ms
45449_71895_99638.png
350 ms
41773_64314_27640.jpg
434 ms
43456_67659_51565.jpg
429 ms
player_RDP_internacional.jpg
303 ms
player_A1.jpg
302 ms
6338_10580_30131.jpg
432 ms
player_A3.jpg
310 ms
d2b825069eaf241202509b4ecdb627f4
403 ms
cac972071a9c48bc9e4e52f44c0312d5_N.jpg
350 ms
b1c72baad582605c4554e2650e955eab_N.jpg
396 ms
bc7575c4cfb324931be8cb267fbb2a13
390 ms
405adf67f09cfe01174dc69120ae8441
407 ms
39eb0fc90fa112040aeaf3e4b22d36dd
428 ms
868620e92ed09d4356d97e844610f9fd
427 ms
b019c6aec1b94bd0a53d9e45f04cfc22
426 ms
82b9d6ef0447313ca0d4d99d75da797c
432 ms
8042ea1fae687c581cefee45b6f81dc2
434 ms
9ad202008fdec2a1234238af85101769
432 ms
c79a6b2956e6d0a6fa0d340424294a2c
433 ms
4c15789cc4ab87e5b363ba80be8ac03f
436 ms
d46e60623deba64a4243b411d5e6612e
434 ms
ed9037fdea17ce31f3dfa127a412913a
435 ms
71fb7e8315acebd996379b753709e3e9
438 ms
15efe30494818cf88d2a364dd36503a1
437 ms
rtpPlay_cheioNegativo_horiz_RGB.png
438 ms
AppleStore.png
441 ms
GooglePlay.png
442 ms
Huawey.png
442 ms
62ae6f1ad6b8c9ead86bf88fb9d881e7
444 ms
0548495e32b7e5909265a9dda9490d73
448 ms
21e02030bcd97a435d52ecc6e5fcb63f
443 ms
31430dc57b16c2cc8e4385afc628c6eb
449 ms
0d63112e6c04285ba9be3cec2c7cee5c
447 ms
d0eb6b31718a37cebb713f39f215fa03
444 ms
b38a7193071149e7c16000d43db8df9e
456 ms
font
349 ms
rdf-icons.woff
70 ms
e119ead9ae266343d336e4688615bd9a
217 ms
QWQOVZ6C.js
155 ms
gpt.js
222 ms
analytics.js
154 ms
pipe-latest.min.js
147 ms
xgemius.js
658 ms
42e6f6e73767ce155ac8df595b4360b8
154 ms
cc0b85f01ee6fabe7d92ed68b3734611
153 ms
25d2c4cf3ffc7e2e9bfd2618cc09053f
126 ms
learn
185 ms
d95c1dabdee3a63f381210dfe174632d
122 ms
a6eba864e83510f24f8486c1d48644ce
118 ms
55622f3e9bb66d5a17f1b0c63138fb26
75 ms
09c863e5c92d755ed888b39426fe2a48
69 ms
pipeconfig
325 ms
8a07f38a4b3ffc34010fb61f07e0964d
60 ms
collect
22 ms
collect
22 ms
rtp.png
46 ms
ga-audiences
64 ms
pubads_impl.js
25 ms
encrypted-tag-g.js
133 ms
esp.js
45 ms
uid2SecureSignal.js
41 ms
connectId-gpt.js
42 ms
pubcid.min.js
34 ms
collect
181 ms
fpdata.js
86 ms
rtp.pt accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rtp.pt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rtp.pt SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PT
PT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtp.pt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtp.pt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtp.pt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RTP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: