Tools & Wizards About Us
rtu5025.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

rtu5025.com

Huobei GSM gate opener and GSM alarm box: IOS and Andorid app supported RTU5024,RTU5015, RTU5025 series gsm gate opener and GSM remote switch controll...

Page Load Speed

10.6 sec in total

First Response

517 ms

Resources Loaded

9.4 sec

Page Rendered

616 ms

rtu5025.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rtu5025.com now to see the best up-to-date RTU5025 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtu5025.com

We provide the RTU5015,RTU5024 GSM REMOTE CONTROLLER,gsm intercom prodducts,GA09,GL09,GA01P,GABP gsm alarm box , gsm relay supply and gsm controller for gsm sms remote conrol project and GSM SMS gate ...

Visit rtu5025.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtu5025.com page load time and found that the first response time was 517 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtu5025.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rtu5025.com

517 ms

reset.css

130 ms

layout.css

131 ms

style.css

147 ms

jquery-1.6.js

462 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rtu5025.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rtu5025.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rtu5025.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 28.4 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 49.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTU5025 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 50.0 kB
  • After minification 49.9 kB
  • After compression 37.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtu5025.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (38%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTU5025. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rtu5025.com

rtu5025.com

517 ms

reset.css

reset.css

130 ms

layout.css

layout.css

131 ms

style.css

style.css

147 ms

jquery-1.6.js

jquery-1.6.js

462 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

145 ms

tms-0.3.js

tms-0.3.js

190 ms

tms_presets.js

tms_presets.js

196 ms

script.js

script.js

192 ms

bg_top.gif

bg_top.gif

66 ms

logo.png

logo.png

195 ms

menu_bg.gif

menu_bg.gif

65 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

66 ms

slider_bg.png

slider_bg.png

117 ms

img1.jpg

img1.jpg

737 ms

img2.jpg

img2.jpg

3471 ms

img3.jpg

img3.jpg

3132 ms

rtu5024-fake.jpg

rtu5024-fake.jpg

8231 ms

New-arrival-intercom.jpg

New-arrival-intercom.jpg

2148 ms

New-arrival-gsm-relay.jpg

New-arrival-gsm-relay.jpg

3011 ms

rtu5024-all.jpg

rtu5024-all.jpg

4860 ms

New-arrival-gsm-alarm.jpg

New-arrival-gsm-alarm.jpg

4756 ms

RTU5024-power.jpg

RTU5024-power.jpg

8022 ms

dropcap.png

dropcap.png

3194 ms

testimonials_bg.gif

testimonials_bg.gif

3257 ms

quot1.png

quot1.png

3320 ms

quot2.png

quot2.png

3694 ms

marker_1.png

marker_1.png

3533 ms

shopping.jpg

shopping.jpg

7451 ms

RTU5015-90.jpg

RTU5015-90.jpg

4665 ms

marker_2.gif

marker_2.gif

4723 ms

rtu5015p_90.jpg

rtu5015p_90.jpg

5504 ms

RTU5015PLUS-99.jpg

RTU5015PLUS-99.jpg

8018 ms

rtu5024-90.jpg

rtu5024-90.jpg

5136 ms

RTU5024-V2017-90.jpg

RTU5024-V2017-90.jpg

6427 ms

rtu5024-v2019-90.jpg

rtu5024-v2019-90.jpg

7172 ms

RTU5024-WAC-90.jpg

RTU5024-WAC-90.jpg

8451 ms

ga01p-90.jpg

ga01p-90.jpg

8013 ms

icon1.jpg

icon1.jpg

7516 ms

icon2.jpg

icon2.jpg

7582 ms

icon3.jpg

icon3.jpg

7648 ms

marker_3.png

marker_3.png

7712 ms

buttons.png

buttons.png

67 ms

Accessibility Review

rtu5025.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rtu5025.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rtu5025.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtu5025.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtu5025.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtu5025.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RTU5025. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: