Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

ru.net

О фонде | Foundation for Assistance for Internet Technologies and Infrastructure Development

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

902 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

ru.net screenshot

About Website

Visit ru.net now to see the best up-to-date Ru content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ru.net

Visit ru.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ru.net page load time and found that the first response time was 902 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ru.net performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ru.faitid.org

902 ms

system.base.css

394 ms

system.menus.css

264 ms

system.messages.css

269 ms

system.theme.css

268 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ru.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (947 ms) relates to the external source Ru.faitid.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 114.6 kB (57%)

Content Size

199.6 kB

After Optimization

85.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Ru.net main page is 199.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 118.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 15.1 kB
  • After minification 14.6 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ru images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 70.8 kB

  • Original 118.0 kB
  • After minification 104.0 kB
  • After compression 47.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.8 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 30.1 kB

  • Original 39.0 kB
  • After minification 29.8 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ru.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (64%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ru. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ru.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ru.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ru.net SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ru.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ru.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ru. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: