Tools & Wizards About Us
rubtheweb.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rubtheweb.com

Best Web Design Company in Cochin | Kerala Webdesign

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

82 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

442 ms

rubtheweb.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rubthe Web content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rubtheweb.com

Leading web design company in Cochin, Kerala webdesign offers the best web designing and development services in Kerala.

Visit rubtheweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rubtheweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rubtheweb.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.728

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rubtheweb.com

82 ms

rubtheweb.com

334 ms

bootstrap.css

352 ms

owl.carousel.css

262 ms

owl.theme.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Rubtheweb.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (856 ms) belongs to the original domain Rubtheweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 350.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rubtheweb.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 44.2 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.7 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 80.5 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rubthe Web images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 224.2 kB

  • Original 521.5 kB
  • After minification 521.5 kB
  • After compression 297.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224.2 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 60.3 kB
  • After compression 52.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rubtheweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (57%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rubthe Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rubtheweb.com

rubtheweb.com

82 ms

rubtheweb.com

rubtheweb.com

334 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

352 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

262 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

33 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

264 ms

animate.css

animate.css

263 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

70 ms

settings.css

settings.css

53 ms

slick.css

slick.css

72 ms

icons.css

icons.css

87 ms

preset.css

preset.css

83 ms

theme.css

theme.css

100 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

108 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

110 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

152 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

126 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

142 ms

gmaps.js

gmaps.js

158 ms

js

js

88 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

170 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

175 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

189 ms

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

193 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

214 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

206 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

230 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

229 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

258 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

247 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

267 ms

dlmenu.js

dlmenu.js

541 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

571 ms

mixer.js

mixer.js

542 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

272 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

282 ms

slick.js

slick.js

292 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

296 ms

theme.js

theme.js

301 ms

RTw-logo.svg

RTw-logo.svg

264 ms

logo.png

logo.png

264 ms

1_1.jpg

1_1.jpg

338 ms

css

css

42 ms

1_2.jpg

1_2.jpg

328 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

856 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

308 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

306 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

302 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

300 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

287 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

338 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

327 ms

1.png

1.png

321 ms

2.png

2.png

335 ms

3.png

3.png

328 ms

4.png

4.png

354 ms

5.png

5.png

351 ms

6.png

6.png

488 ms

line-maker.svg

line-maker.svg

434 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

334 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

525 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

574 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

371 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

372 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

93 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

94 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

133 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

282 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

283 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

282 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

41 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

581 ms

Accessibility Review

rubtheweb.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

rubtheweb.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rubtheweb.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rubtheweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rubtheweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rubtheweb.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rubthe Web. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: