4.4 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.9 sec
137 ms
Visit rubyfoam.com now to see the best up-to-date Rubyfoam content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rubyfoam.com
Default Description
Visit rubyfoam.comWe analyzed Rubyfoam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rubyfoam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value4.1 s
87/100
10%
1381 ms
16 ms
388 ms
202 ms
217 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Rubyfoam.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rubyfoam.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (58%)
1.8 MB
738.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Rubyfoam.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 790.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rubyfoam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 579.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 579.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 433.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rubyfoam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 433.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (88%)
48
6
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rubyfoam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rubyfoam.com
1381 ms
font-awesome.min.css
16 ms
bootstrap.min.css
388 ms
main.css
202 ms
animate.min.css
217 ms
yamm.css
140 ms
sidenav.css
193 ms
prototype.js
461 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
342 ms
noconflict.js
265 ms
ccard.js
272 ms
validation.js
297 ms
builder.js
339 ms
effects.js
406 ms
dragdrop.js
444 ms
controls.js
501 ms
slider.js
404 ms
js.js
448 ms
form.js
493 ms
translate.js
492 ms
cookies.js
516 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
581 ms
selectivizr.js
605 ms
matchMedia.js
539 ms
matchMedia.addListener.js
540 ms
enquire.js
572 ms
app.js
713 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
727 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
604 ms
slideshow.js
643 ms
imagesloaded.js
650 ms
minicart.js
678 ms
css
33 ms
styles.css
810 ms
madisonisland.css
788 ms
generic-nav.css
719 ms
grid12.css
756 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
942 ms
jquery.min.js
117 ms
large_tabs.css
730 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
669 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
729 ms
css
14 ms
bootstrap.min.js
795 ms
easyResponsiveTabs.js
665 ms
logo.png
78 ms
cart.png
74 ms
banner1.jpg
695 ms
pay.png
149 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
61 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
80 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
114 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
115 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
162 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
10 ms
ufonts.com_din-light-webfont.woff
98 ms
rubyfoam.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
rubyfoam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rubyfoam.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rubyfoam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rubyfoam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rubyfoam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rubyfoam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: