Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    65% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    41% of websites

rubyweb.org

Ruby Web

Page Load Speed

818 ms in total

First Response

213 ms

Resources Loaded

605 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

rubyweb.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ruby Web content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rubyweb.org

Internet solutions for professionals

Visit rubyweb.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Rubyweb.org page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 605 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rubyweb.org performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rubyweb.org

213 ms

light4.css

60 ms

wp.css

60 ms

wp-embed.min.js

52 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rubyweb.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (213 ms) belongs to the original domain Rubyweb.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.8 kB (69%)

Content Size

71.0 kB

After Optimization

22.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Rubyweb.org main page is 71.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 35.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 14.5 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 6.4 kB
  • After minification 6.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ruby Web images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 27.1 kB

  • Original 35.2 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 10.7 kB
  • After minification 9.9 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rubyweb.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ruby Web. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rubyweb.org accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rubyweb.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rubyweb.org SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rubyweb.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rubyweb.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ruby Web. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: