Tools & Wizards About Us
ruef.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

ruef.com

Your brand. Elevated. | ruef Design | digital marketing Dayton, Ohio

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

796 ms

ruef.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ruef content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ruef.com

Your brand.Elevated. Content that captivates and inspires growth. Your brand. Elevated. let's talkShowing how exceptional craftsmanship lives for 120 years ... Read More

Visit ruef.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ruef.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ruef.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,390 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ruef.com

49 ms

ruef.com

62 ms

js

372 ms

09f4150c0d58e62b08252635411ae3bc.css

19 ms

0beeea3f3db3b04cb6cacc94beba8508.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ruef.com, 20% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (623 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 329.7 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ruef.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 315.5 kB

  • Original 343.3 kB
  • After minification 341.8 kB
  • After compression 27.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 315.5 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ruef images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 344.6 kB
  • After minification 344.6 kB
  • After compression 340.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 190 B

  • Original 68.8 kB
  • After minification 68.8 kB
  • After compression 68.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ruef.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (56%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ruef. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ruef.com

ruef.com

49 ms

ruef.com

ruef.com

62 ms

js

js

372 ms

09f4150c0d58e62b08252635411ae3bc.css

09f4150c0d58e62b08252635411ae3bc.css

19 ms

0beeea3f3db3b04cb6cacc94beba8508.css

0beeea3f3db3b04cb6cacc94beba8508.css

58 ms

27e92d1d848965ba86e77a1cc9f11c01.css

27e92d1d848965ba86e77a1cc9f11c01.css

39 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

48 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

51 ms

video-lightbox.js

video-lightbox.js

74 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

74 ms

css

css

105 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

68 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

44 ms

2722c7bb103f5b8ad2a7712ca654b7c5.js

2722c7bb103f5b8ad2a7712ca654b7c5.js

354 ms

x.js

x.js

353 ms

0df8a2ba20e621d2a776e8f3890354aa.js

0df8a2ba20e621d2a776e8f3890354aa.js

352 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

353 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

352 ms

ed860f82fcc350ddbccea69ec74dabc9.js

ed860f82fcc350ddbccea69ec74dabc9.js

352 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

359 ms

api.js

api.js

361 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

300 ms

header-logo-300-px.png

header-logo-300-px.png

269 ms

ahaus-logo-white.png

ahaus-logo-white.png

270 ms

coolidge-logo-white.png

coolidge-logo-white.png

272 ms

hartzell-logo-white.png

hartzell-logo-white.png

269 ms

legrand-logo-white.png

legrand-logo-white.png

271 ms

National-Hardwoods-Lumber-Association-logo-white.png

National-Hardwoods-Lumber-Association-logo-white.png

273 ms

north-west-hardwoods-logo-white.png

north-west-hardwoods-logo-white.png

277 ms

osborn-logo-white.png

osborn-logo-white.png

275 ms

planes-logo-white.png

planes-logo-white.png

279 ms

stober-logo-white-circular-2.png

stober-logo-white-circular-2.png

275 ms

stolle-logo-white.png

stolle-logo-white.png

277 ms

ruef-Design-03.jpg

ruef-Design-03.jpg

185 ms

ruef-Design-07018.jpg

ruef-Design-07018.jpg

190 ms

ruef-Design-436.jpg

ruef-Design-436.jpg

191 ms

ruef-Design-00391.jpg

ruef-Design-00391.jpg

186 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

187 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

191 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

486 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

621 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

619 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

623 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

622 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

622 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

622 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

518 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

516 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

593 ms

anchor

anchor

109 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

5 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

13 ms

IDLZ5bdCrEGdGR5FKKZfiIWvV7rMSlbAHUEzxUIOBQg.js

IDLZ5bdCrEGdGR5FKKZfiIWvV7rMSlbAHUEzxUIOBQg.js

39 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

74 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

23 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

34 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

31 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

33 ms

Accessibility Review

ruef.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ruef.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ruef.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ruef.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ruef.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ruef.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ruef. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: