7.1 sec in total
743 ms
5.1 sec
1.2 sec
Visit rufact.org now to see the best up-to-date Rufact content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rufact.org
Интересные факты о России каждый день. История, политика, география, открытия, изобретения, наука, герои, войны, искусство, праздники.
Visit rufact.orgWe analyzed Rufact.org page load time and found that the first response time was 743 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rufact.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value2,760 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.3 s
1/100
10%
743 ms
32 ms
55 ms
53 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Rufact.org, 14% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Cs627421.vk.me.
Page size can be reduced by 420.9 kB (41%)
1.0 MB
611.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Rufact.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 529.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rufact needs image optimization as it can save up to 80.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 185.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rufact.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (38%)
81
50
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rufact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rufact.org
743 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
55 ms
jquery-ui.css
53 ms
base.css
182 ms
polls.css
185 ms
pagination.css
186 ms
common.js
198 ms
305 ms
adsbygoogle.js
4 ms
header2.png
1535 ms
rutopy.gif
576 ms
logo.gif
202 ms
openapi.js
379 ms
advert.js
190 ms
leader.gif
95 ms
search_button.gif
184 ms
facebook_16.png
367 ms
ok_16.png
188 ms
twitter.png
252 ms
vk16.png
280 ms
timeline.gif
283 ms
7vlp.jpeg
305 ms
lipb.jpeg
369 ms
hly0.jpeg
377 ms
dufi.jpeg
400 ms
hlus.jpeg
463 ms
56pv.jpeg
585 ms
7mrc.jpeg
472 ms
ghea.jpeg
645 ms
zrv4.jpeg
569 ms
8te1.jpeg
585 ms
sbdr.jpeg
584 ms
ndfs.jpeg
715 ms
5bjf.jpeg
713 ms
9mp8.jpeg
712 ms
kser.jpeg
713 ms
q3fw.jpeg
713 ms
l7m3.jpeg
806 ms
lftv.jpeg
805 ms
g5fv.jpeg
806 ms
pow7.jpeg
805 ms
kolw.jpeg
696 ms
ijl9.jpeg
766 ms
iufs.jpeg
767 ms
ca-pub-9773417036288474.js
60 ms
zrt_lookup.html
57 ms
show_ads_impl.js
58 ms
backquote.gif
731 ms
ads
274 ms
osd.js
4 ms
upload.gif
127 ms
all.js
151 ms
widget_community.php
305 ms
hit
282 ms
ads
268 ms
188 ms
xd_arbiter.php
246 ms
xd_arbiter.php
354 ms
3938644442375544542
123 ms
abg.js
72 ms
m_js_controller.js
71 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
197 ms
15704920305519909359
78 ms
loader_nav19172_3.js
155 ms
lite.css
153 ms
lite.js
492 ms
lang3_0.js
280 ms
widget_community.css
295 ms
xdm.js
290 ms
al_community.js
289 ms
s
115 ms
redir.html
195 ms
x_button_blue2.png
85 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
8 ms
iframe.html
48 ms
e_ca2b3e55.jpg
377 ms
ndEruapbCH0.jpg
367 ms
ej-qlI85Kmo.jpg
3105 ms
x0oz3pPGL0Y.jpg
360 ms
0JQXlyF55E8.jpg
382 ms
camera_50.png
127 ms
w_logo.png
122 ms
rufact.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
rufact.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rufact.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rufact.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rufact.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rufact.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rufact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: