Tools & Wizards About Us
rufftuff.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

rufftuff.com

Ruff Tuff | America's Finest Custom Seat Covers

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

472 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

3 ms

rufftuff.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rufftuff.com now to see the best up-to-date Ruff Tuff content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rufftuff.com

America's finest custom seat covers - made in America using the finest fabrics available - Ford F-150, Toyota Tacoma, Jeep, many other makes and models.

Visit rufftuff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rufftuff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 472 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rufftuff.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rufftuff.com

472 ms

css

41 ms

all.css

47 ms

main.css

113 ms

jquery.min.js

139 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Rufftuff.com, 15% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Pro.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (538 ms) belongs to the original domain Rufftuff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 58.4 kB (7%)

Content Size

886.6 kB

After Optimization

828.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rufftuff.com main page is 886.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 655.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 58.1 kB

  • Original 71.9 kB
  • After minification 70.5 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 118 B

  • Original 655.5 kB
  • After minification 655.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ruff Tuff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 160 B

  • Original 89.7 kB
  • After minification 89.7 kB
  • After compression 89.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 66 B

  • Original 69.5 kB
  • After minification 69.5 kB
  • After compression 69.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rufftuff.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (38%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ruff Tuff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rufftuff.com

www.rufftuff.com

472 ms

css

css

41 ms

all.css

all.css

47 ms

main.css

main.css

113 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

139 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

194 ms

gf.placeholders.js

gf.placeholders.js

198 ms

all.css

all.css

38 ms

main.js

main.js

349 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

115 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

144 ms

ruff_tuff_logo_horizontal_black.svg

ruff_tuff_logo_horizontal_black.svg

124 ms

Seat-Covers-Hero_2.jpg

Seat-Covers-Hero_2.jpg

538 ms

stripes.png

stripes.png

123 ms

Gift-Card-Graphic-Shadow-1.png

Gift-Card-Graphic-Shadow-1.png

359 ms

gallery-head.jpg

gallery-head.jpg

432 ms

fabrics-head.jpg

fabrics-head.jpg

360 ms

accessories-head.jpg

accessories-head.jpg

431 ms

home-support.jpg

home-support.jpg

531 ms

font

font

253 ms

font

font

253 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

195 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

250 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

251 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

209 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

86 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

106 ms

Accessibility Review

rufftuff.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rufftuff.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rufftuff.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rufftuff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rufftuff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rufftuff.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ruff Tuff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: