Tools & Wizards About Us
rugtemecula.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

rugtemecula.com

Rustam Rug Gallery | Temecula Carpet & Rug Cleaning Experts

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

505 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

rugtemecula.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rugtemecula.com now to see the best up-to-date Rug Temecula content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rugtemecula.com

Rustam Rug Gallery is a team of carpet and rug cleaning experts specializing not just in cleaning, but also in repair and selling of rugs across Temecula.

Visit rugtemecula.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rugtemecula.com page load time and found that the first response time was 505 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rugtemecula.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rugtemecula.com

505 ms

autoptimize_bdfced1798fed7ab125643c62e7410fd.css

309 ms

autoptimize_single_e14f1af78da68888f30857ebbc68f94a.css

289 ms

autoptimize_single_3e03fd3dec609a6b4b1a70d3d80bfb5f.css

300 ms

autoptimize_single_6bc52170f0c211a3e334b9a1e93f92d9.css

386 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Rugtemecula.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rugtemecula.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

4.9 MB

After Optimization

4.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rugtemecula.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 77.0 kB

  • Original 99.3 kB
  • After minification 99.0 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 61.9 kB

  • Original 4.3 MB
  • After minification 4.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rug Temecula images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 396.1 kB
  • After minification 396.1 kB
  • After compression 393.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 63.5 kB

  • Original 124.0 kB
  • After minification 60.6 kB
  • After compression 60.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rugtemecula.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 51% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (31%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rug Temecula. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rugtemecula.com

rugtemecula.com

505 ms

autoptimize_bdfced1798fed7ab125643c62e7410fd.css

autoptimize_bdfced1798fed7ab125643c62e7410fd.css

309 ms

autoptimize_single_e14f1af78da68888f30857ebbc68f94a.css

autoptimize_single_e14f1af78da68888f30857ebbc68f94a.css

289 ms

autoptimize_single_3e03fd3dec609a6b4b1a70d3d80bfb5f.css

autoptimize_single_3e03fd3dec609a6b4b1a70d3d80bfb5f.css

300 ms

autoptimize_single_6bc52170f0c211a3e334b9a1e93f92d9.css

autoptimize_single_6bc52170f0c211a3e334b9a1e93f92d9.css

386 ms

autoptimize_single_29496bfb34af01764bab9450756122e4.css

autoptimize_single_29496bfb34af01764bab9450756122e4.css

402 ms

css2

css2

29 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

413 ms

js

js

66 ms

js

js

110 ms

css

css

13 ms

api.js

api.js

38 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

436 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

437 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

564 ms

autoptimize_9881431c58179bf57735808ae283e0c2.js

autoptimize_9881431c58179bf57735808ae283e0c2.js

671 ms

mainlogo.png

mainlogo.png

273 ms

BannerSlider1-1-1511x850.jpg

BannerSlider1-1-1511x850.jpg

752 ms

bannerSlider3.jpg

bannerSlider3.jpg

915 ms

bannerSlider2.jpg

bannerSlider2.jpg

751 ms

bannerSlider4.jpg

bannerSlider4.jpg

752 ms

bannerSlider5-1511x850.jpg

bannerSlider5-1511x850.jpg

752 ms

testimonialBg.jpg

testimonialBg.jpg

998 ms

abtNewImg.jpg

abtNewImg.jpg

998 ms

rugType1-1.jpg

rugType1-1.jpg

883 ms

rugType2-1.jpg

rugType2-1.jpg

880 ms

rugType3-1.jpg

rugType3-1.jpg

881 ms

rugType4-1.jpg

rugType4-1.jpg

996 ms

rugType5-1.jpg

rugType5-1.jpg

997 ms

rugType6-1.jpg

rugType6-1.jpg

998 ms

rugClean1-1.jpg

rugClean1-1.jpg

1115 ms

rugIcon1.png

rugIcon1.png

1016 ms

rugIcon2.png

rugIcon2.png

1014 ms

rugIcon3.png

rugIcon3.png

1022 ms

rugImg4.png

rugImg4.png

1023 ms

featuredRug1-300x300.jpg

featuredRug1-300x300.jpg

1025 ms

featuredRug2-300x300.jpg

featuredRug2-300x300.jpg

1249 ms

featuredRug3-300x300.jpg

featuredRug3-300x300.jpg

1113 ms

featuredRug4-300x300.jpg

featuredRug4-300x300.jpg

1123 ms

featureImg5.jpg

featureImg5.jpg

1528 ms

tagBg2.jpg

tagBg2.jpg

1224 ms

cnRug2.jpg

cnRug2.jpg

1211 ms

cnRugImage2.jpg

cnRugImage2.jpg

1216 ms

ajax_loader.png

ajax_loader.png

1224 ms

before-after-carpet-cleaning-1.png

before-after-carpet-cleaning-1.png

1403 ms

before-after-carpet-cleaning-2.jpg

before-after-carpet-cleaning-2.jpg

1319 ms

IMG_5336.jpg

IMG_5336.jpg

1324 ms

IMG_5291.jpg

IMG_5291.jpg

1239 ms

IMG_5204.jpg

IMG_5204.jpg

1258 ms

js

js

101 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

83 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

127 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4k.woff

159 ms

font

font

178 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

179 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

180 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

179 ms

carousel-arrows.woff

carousel-arrows.woff

1274 ms

-ECqbfX0IUA

-ECqbfX0IUA

217 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1211 ms

collect

collect

54 ms

IMG_4859.jpg

IMG_4859.jpg

1166 ms

IMG_5287.jpg

IMG_5287.jpg

1136 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

7 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

27 ms

base.js

base.js

54 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

267 ms

6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js

6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js

84 ms

embed.js

embed.js

40 ms

IMG_5286.jpg

IMG_5286.jpg

756 ms

IMG_5323.jpg

IMG_5323.jpg

779 ms

IMG_5316.jpg

IMG_5316.jpg

784 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

124 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

126 ms

Create

Create

38 ms

id

id

15 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

14 ms

Accessibility Review

rugtemecula.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rugtemecula.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rugtemecula.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rugtemecula.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rugtemecula.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rugtemecula.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rug Temecula. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: