Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

rulife.eu

rulife.eu

Page Load Speed

28.9 sec in total

First Response

649 ms

Resources Loaded

27.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

rulife.eu screenshot

About Website

Visit rulife.eu now to see the best up-to-date Rulife content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rulife.eu

This domain may be for sale!

Visit rulife.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Rulife.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 649 ms and then it took 28.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

rulife.eu performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rulife.eu

649 ms

css.php

985 ms

css.php

588 ms

jquery.min.js

203 ms

xenforo.js

2028 ms

Our browser made a total of 151 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Rulife.eu, 5% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Pixel2368.everesttech.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (65%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

872.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Rulife.eu main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 321.6 kB

  • Original 374.7 kB
  • After minification 361.6 kB
  • After compression 53.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 321.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 356.6 kB
  • After minification 340.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rulife images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 462.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 129.5 kB

  • Original 145.4 kB
  • After minification 124.9 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rulife.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 129.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (58%)

Requests Now

132

After Optimization

55

The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rulife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

rulife.eu SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rulife.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Rulife.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rulife. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: