Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

794 ms

Resources Loaded

967 ms

Page Rendered

105 ms

rumor-forest.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rumor Forest content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rumor-forest.net

This website is for sale! rumor-forest.net is your first and best source for information about rumor-forest . Here you will also find topics relating to issues of general interest. We hope you find w...

Visit rumor-forest.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rumor-forest.net page load time and found that the first response time was 794 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rumor-forest.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rumor-forest.net

794 ms

jquery.min.js

5 ms

sprite1011.png

20 ms

rl.php

153 ms

ga.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rumor-forest.net, 29% (2 requests) were made to Img.sedoparking.com and 29% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (794 ms) belongs to the original domain Rumor-forest.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 26.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

60.4 kB

After Optimization

33.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Rumor-forest.net main page is 60.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 34.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

  • Original 34.8 kB
  • After minification 34.8 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 7.8 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rumor Forest needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 47% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 404 B

  • Original 17.8 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 17.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rumor Forest. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rumor-forest.net accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rumor-forest.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rumor-forest.net SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rumor-forest.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rumor-forest.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rumor Forest. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: