Tools & Wizards About Us
runefjord.dk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

runefjord.dk

RuneFjord.dk

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

590 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

70 ms

runefjord.dk screenshot

About Website

Visit runefjord.dk now to see the best up-to-date Rune Fjord content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about runefjord.dk

Visit runefjord.dk

Key Findings

We analyzed Runefjord.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 590 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

runefjord.dk performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.155

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

runefjord.dk

590 ms

style.min.css

195 ms

yui3.css

292 ms

fl-slideshow.min.css

295 ms

all.min.css

296 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Runefjord.dk, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (599 ms) belongs to the original domain Runefjord.dk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 221.1 kB (42%)

Content Size

520.4 kB

After Optimization

299.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Runefjord.dk main page is 520.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 265.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 220.2 kB

  • Original 265.7 kB
  • After minification 265.6 kB
  • After compression 45.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 220.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 11.5 kB
  • After minification 11.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rune Fjord images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 514 B

  • Original 171.1 kB
  • After minification 171.1 kB
  • After compression 170.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 439 B

  • Original 72.0 kB
  • After minification 71.8 kB
  • After compression 71.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runefjord.dk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (90%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rune Fjord. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

runefjord.dk

runefjord.dk

590 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

195 ms

yui3.css

yui3.css

292 ms

fl-slideshow.min.css

fl-slideshow.min.css

295 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

296 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

292 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

289 ms

jquery.magnificpopup.min.css

jquery.magnificpopup.min.css

295 ms

bootstrap-4.min.css

bootstrap-4.min.css

482 ms

style.css

style.css

380 ms

css

css

31 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

487 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

381 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

381 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

382 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

501 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

500 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

416 ms

yui3.min.js

yui3.min.js

586 ms

fl-slideshow.min.js

fl-slideshow.min.js

491 ms

jquery.imagesloaded.min.js

jquery.imagesloaded.min.js

489 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

490 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

492 ms

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

491 ms

jquery.magnificpopup.min.js

jquery.magnificpopup.min.js

598 ms

bootstrap-4.min.js

bootstrap-4.min.js

598 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

599 ms

lc.js

lc.js

599 ms

rf_hvid_2_lin_shdw.png

rf_hvid_2_lin_shdw.png

496 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

17 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

23 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

28 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

330 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

233 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

327 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

99 ms

Accessibility Review

runefjord.dk accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

runefjord.dk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

runefjord.dk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DA

  • Language Claimed

    DA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runefjord.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Runefjord.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

runefjord.dk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rune Fjord. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: