16.6 sec in total
1.6 sec
14.7 sec
382 ms
Visit runnersfeed.com now to see the best up-to-date Runnersfeed content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about runnersfeed.com
Visit runnersfeed.comWe analyzed Runnersfeed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 15.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
runnersfeed.com performance score
1576 ms
272 ms
204 ms
433 ms
249 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Runnersfeed.com, 12% (9 requests) were made to Raceroster.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Raceroster.com.
Page size can be reduced by 464.4 kB (41%)
1.1 MB
668.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Runnersfeed.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 450.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Runnersfeed images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 235.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 235.4 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 170.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runnersfeed.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (63%)
73
27
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Runnersfeed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
runnersfeed.com
1576 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
272 ms
overlay-basic.css
204 ms
bootstrap.css
433 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
249 ms
flexslider.css
290 ms
style.css
390 ms
prettyphoto.css
347 ms
options.css
360 ms
polls-css.css
425 ms
lightbox.min.css
440 ms
jquery.tools.min.wp-front.v3.js
513 ms
jquery.js
741 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
492 ms
adsbygoogle.js
81 ms
polls-js.js
413 ms
superfish.js
486 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
500 ms
bootstrap.js
530 ms
jquery.li-scroller.1.0.js
590 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
597 ms
jquery.collapse.js
640 ms
tabs.js
721 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.js
753 ms
scrolltopcontrol.js
722 ms
respond.min.js
722 ms
custom.js
753 ms
jquery.touchwipe.min.js
821 ms
jquery.lightbox.min.js
821 ms
ga.js
86 ms
bg26.jpg
524 ms
RF_Logo_250x115.png
140 ms
title-indicator.png
190 ms
2013-01-10_16-22-06_uid7356.jpeg
382 ms
Santas-running-50x50.jpg
433 ms
springrunning-50x50.jpeg
431 ms
chickpea-and-carrot-fritters-picture-50x50.jpg
432 ms
cauliflowerpizza.jpg
531 ms
buylocal-50x50.jpeg
527 ms
bagelbanana-50x50.jpeg
525 ms
CheesecakeStuffedPeaches-50x50.jpg
527 ms
image-770x433.jpeg
589 ms
TOP5-50x50.jpeg
527 ms
woman-weight-lifting-50x50.jpg
595 ms
ryanhall-50x50.jpeg
671 ms
ca-pub-3299031236716205.js
470 ms
zrt_lookup.html
467 ms
show_ads_impl.js
376 ms
__utm.gif
62 ms
all
3018 ms
ads
408 ms
osd.js
128 ms
ads
380 ms
ads
343 ms
14252334285041306334
219 ms
abg.js
198 ms
m_js_controller.js
157 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
241 ms
s
122 ms
x_button_blue2.png
124 ms
favicon
113 ms
mobile_unified_button_icon_white.png
54 ms
j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js
34 ms
activeview
83 ms
activeview
180 ms
247 ms
jquery.min.js
1619 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1523 ms
modernizr-latest.js
1523 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
1525 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
1524 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3891 ms
sort_both.png
2166 ms
sort_asc.png
68 ms
nr-918.min.js
75 ms
runnersfeed.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runnersfeed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Runnersfeed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
runnersfeed.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Runnersfeed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: