Tools & Wizards About Us
rusff.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

rusff.ru

Лучшие отели Воронежа. Выгодное предложение. Доходный дом "Фараон". Комфортное проживание, низкие цены.

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

540 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

311 ms

rusff.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit rusff.ru now to see the best up-to-date Rusff content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rusff.ru

Лучшие гостиницы города

Visit rusff.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Rusff.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 540 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rusff.ru performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rusff.ru

540 ms

style.css

132 ms

ceebox.css

261 ms

jquery-min.js

538 ms

jquery.cycle.js

268 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Rusff.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Stg.odnoklassniki.ru and 3% (2 requests) were made to S3.uploads.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rusff.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 333.7 kB (54%)

Content Size

613.9 kB

After Optimization

280.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rusff.ru main page is 613.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 404.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 25.7 kB

  • Original 33.4 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 184.9 kB

  • Original 404.4 kB
  • After minification 219.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rusff needs image optimization as it can save up to 184.9 kB or 46% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 102.0 kB

  • Original 149.6 kB
  • After minification 137.1 kB
  • After compression 47.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 21.0 kB

  • Original 26.5 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rusff.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (35%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rusff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rusff.ru

rusff.ru

540 ms

style.css

style.css

132 ms

ceebox.css

ceebox.css

261 ms

jquery-min.js

jquery-min.js

538 ms

jquery.cycle.js

jquery.cycle.js

268 ms

jquery.corner.js

jquery.corner.js

270 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

268 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

270 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.minified_code.js

jquery.hoverIntent.minified_code.js

387 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

408 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

407 ms

jquery.ceebox-min.js

jquery.ceebox-min.js

407 ms

autoresize.js

autoresize.js

410 ms

odkl_share.css

odkl_share.css

933 ms

odkl_share.js

odkl_share.js

936 ms

watch.js

watch.js

1 ms

new.css

new.css

393 ms

odkl_share.js

odkl_share.js

315 ms

noise.png

noise.png

688 ms

1-1329726002.png

1-1329726002.png

413 ms

news-point-bck.png

news-point-bck.png

694 ms

live-r-main.png

live-r-main.png

948 ms

kQApd.png

kQApd.png

505 ms

light.png

light.png

169 ms

lang10.png

lang10.png

166 ms

logo.png

logo.png

166 ms

navs.png

navs.png

295 ms

downarrow.png

downarrow.png

167 ms

contbox_bg.png

contbox_bg.png

297 ms

tail.png

tail.png

297 ms

back.png

back.png

297 ms

man.png

man.png

301 ms

time.png

time.png

422 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

423 ms

lineblock.png

lineblock.png

423 ms

left-arrow.png

left-arrow.png

424 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

434 ms

gifts_logo.png

gifts_logo.png

561 ms

pixel.png

pixel.png

561 ms

awards_logo.png

awards_logo.png

700 ms

520401131720212498.png

520401131720212498.png

563 ms

points_icon.png

points_icon.png

576 ms

bannersystem.png

bannersystem.png

695 ms

reputation.png

reputation.png

694 ms

timemachine_3807.png

timemachine_3807.png

827 ms

rss_bar.png

rss_bar.png

809 ms

vk_bar.png

vk_bar.png

824 ms

twt_bar.png

twt_bar.png

826 ms

sep1.gif

sep1.gif

828 ms

adOCg.jpg

adOCg.jpg

452 ms

sp-theme.png

sp-theme.png

836 ms

sp-time.png

sp-time.png

898 ms

sp-user.png

sp-user.png

906 ms

bf-link.png

bf-link.png

923 ms

footer-line.png

footer-line.png

911 ms

quadrosystems.png

quadrosystems.png

914 ms

arial.woff

arial.woff

973 ms

MyriadPro-Cond.woff

MyriadPro-Cond.woff

1038 ms

hit;RusFF

hit;RusFF

265 ms

hit;RusFF

hit;RusFF

127 ms

120 ms

arial.ttf

arial.ttf

159 ms

myriad-c.ttf

myriad-c.ttf

142 ms

arial.svg

arial.svg

169 ms

MyriadPro-Cond.svg

MyriadPro-Cond.svg

155 ms

SEO Factors

rusff.ru SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rusff.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rusff.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rusff.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rusff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: