8.6 sec in total
323 ms
7.3 sec
921 ms
Welcome to rushcliff.com homepage info - get ready to check Rushcliff best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about rushcliff.com
Transform your clinic with PPS—patient and practice management software. From clinical notes to exercise programs, Private Practice Software has it all!
Visit rushcliff.comWe analyzed Rushcliff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 323 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
rushcliff.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value15.4 s
1/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.091
92/100
15%
Value16.6 s
5/100
10%
323 ms
427 ms
393 ms
403 ms
450 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rushcliff.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Secureservercdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 605.4 kB (24%)
2.5 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Rushcliff.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 172.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 172.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 300.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rushcliff needs image optimization as it can save up to 300.1 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 117.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.0 kB or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rushcliff.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (78%)
86
19
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rushcliff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
privatepracticesoftware.co.uk
323 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
427 ms
style.min.css
393 ms
styles.css
403 ms
settings.css
450 ms
simple-banner.css
465 ms
spb-styles.css
567 ms
swift-slider.min.css
713 ms
style.css
728 ms
bootstrap.min.css
730 ms
font-awesome.min.css
772 ms
v4-shims.min.css
789 ms
iconfont.css
892 ms
main.css
1228 ms
sf-responsive.css
1101 ms
style.css
1099 ms
jquery.min.js
1221 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1136 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1384 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1516 ms
simple-banner.js
1425 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1459 ms
jquery.viewports.min.js
1551 ms
plyr.js
1561 ms
js
169 ms
js
191 ms
mc-validate.js
184 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
2022 ms
style-min.css
2024 ms
index.js
2019 ms
index.js
2033 ms
modernizr-custom.js
2035 ms
spb-functions.min.js
2148 ms
swift-slider.min.js
2232 ms
jquery.smartresize.min.js
2154 ms
js.cookie.js
2233 ms
bootstrap.min.js
2578 ms
core.min.js
2246 ms
accordion.min.js
2579 ms
js
188 ms
css
134 ms
lightslider.min.js
2222 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
2217 ms
jquery.equalHeights.js
2208 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
2170 ms
jquery.stickyplugin.js
2441 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
2289 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
2188 ms
jquery.appear.js
2174 ms
jquery.auto-grow-input.min.js
2171 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
2158 ms
ilightbox.min.js
2488 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
2387 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
2184 ms
jquery.dotdotdot.js
2162 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
2142 ms
jquery.fittext.js
2059 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
2216 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
2184 ms
jquery.stickem.js
2169 ms
jquery.timeago.js
2135 ms
jquery.viewport.js
2076 ms
gtm.js
384 ms
jquery.visible.min.js
1853 ms
functions.js
2036 ms
jquery.equalheights.min.js
1988 ms
velocity.min.js
1992 ms
floatMenu-min.js
1984 ms
PPS_logo_2.png
1972 ms
Dojo-slider-image1-scaled.jpg
2721 ms
Tiny-dojo-logo-300x150.png
2611 ms
three-1-scaled.jpg
2635 ms
four-1-scaled.jpg
2562 ms
five-1-scaled.jpg
2555 ms
two-1-scaled.jpg
2545 ms
six-1-scaled.jpg
2382 ms
one-1-scaled.jpg
2382 ms
PPS_icons_secure.png
2636 ms
PPS_icons_flexible.png
2637 ms
PPS_icons_seamless.png
2637 ms
PPS_mockup_mac_4.png
3110 ms
analytics.js
199 ms
PPS_mockup_phone_4.png
2860 ms
tracking.js
279 ms
collect
337 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2469 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2685 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
2472 ms
nucleo-interface.ttf
2472 ms
collect
425 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2195 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2572 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
2122 ms
gen_204
767 ms
rushcliff.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rushcliff.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
rushcliff.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rushcliff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rushcliff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rushcliff.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rushcliff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: