Tools & Wizards About Us
russam.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

russam.ru

Интернет-галерея «RS1912 Русские самоцветы»

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

465 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

381 ms

russam.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Russam content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about russam.ru

Ювелирные украшения, столовое серебро и предметы интерьера

Visit russam.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Russam.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 465 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

russam.ru performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,030 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.131

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

russam.ru

465 ms

russam.ru

1187 ms

page_9266755d57a48305af59a2907ec026be_v1.css

234 ms

template_3d006da64455e956c8efc049095703b9_v1.css

574 ms

b2.min.css

803 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Russam.ru, 6% (4 requests) were made to Top-fwz1.mail.ru and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn1.imshop.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Russam.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 860.3 kB (21%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Russam.ru main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 696.7 kB

  • Original 782.9 kB
  • After minification 487.3 kB
  • After compression 86.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 295.6 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 696.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Russam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 120.6 kB

  • Original 948.7 kB
  • After minification 948.7 kB
  • After compression 828.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.6 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 25.5 kB

  • Original 89.7 kB
  • After minification 89.6 kB
  • After compression 64.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Russam.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (59%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Russam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

russam.ru

russam.ru

465 ms

russam.ru

russam.ru

1187 ms

page_9266755d57a48305af59a2907ec026be_v1.css

page_9266755d57a48305af59a2907ec026be_v1.css

234 ms

template_3d006da64455e956c8efc049095703b9_v1.css

template_3d006da64455e956c8efc049095703b9_v1.css

574 ms

b2.min.css

b2.min.css

803 ms

sprite.svg

sprite.svg

458 ms

logo-icon.svg

logo-icon.svg

463 ms

loader.svg

loader.svg

346 ms

mob-copy.jpg

mob-copy.jpg

458 ms

Frame-1.png

Frame-1.png

1043 ms

M.PNG

M.PNG

924 ms

M.PNG

M.PNG

1024 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

689 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

691 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

870 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

871 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

925 ms

5q81eyildlc3wnahtfrwcu7yr6bli1nv.png

5q81eyildlc3wnahtfrwcu7yr6bli1nv.png

1141 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

1042 ms

banner-image@2x.png

banner-image@2x.png

1042 ms

core.js

core.js

950 ms

protobuf.js

protobuf.js

1040 ms

model.js

model.js

1055 ms

core_promise.js

core_promise.js

1052 ms

rest.client.js

rest.client.js

1053 ms

pull.client.js

pull.client.js

1069 ms

core_fx.js

core_fx.js

1149 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

1156 ms

api.js

api.js

75 ms

b2.min.js

b2.min.js

806 ms

script.js

script.js

1173 ms

vendor.js

vendor.js

1195 ms

main.js

main.js

1176 ms

backend.js

backend.js

1187 ms

script.js

script.js

1261 ms

script.js

script.js

1268 ms

client.js

client.js

765 ms

found-out-size.jpg

found-out-size.jpg

1392 ms

list-reserve-1.jpg

list-reserve-1.jpg

1418 ms

card-1.jpg

card-1.jpg

1418 ms

TTCommons-Light.woff

TTCommons-Light.woff

679 ms

TTCommons-Regular.woff

TTCommons-Regular.woff

657 ms

TTCommons-Medium.woff

TTCommons-Medium.woff

678 ms

TTCommons-Bold.woff

TTCommons-Bold.woff

678 ms

HeliosExt-Regular.woff

HeliosExt-Regular.woff

768 ms

HeliosExt-Bold.woff

HeliosExt-Bold.woff

789 ms

HeliosExt-Light.woff

HeliosExt-Light.woff

788 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

30 ms

tag.js

tag.js

943 ms

ba.js

ba.js

417 ms

init

init

969 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

212 ms

code.js

code.js

914 ms

call.tracker.js

call.tracker.js

406 ms

csc-event

csc-event

623 ms

_health

_health

589 ms

js

js

78 ms

bx_stat

bx_stat

204 ms

openapi.a2ed73393cad04481c1dfb3f7794921f.js

openapi.a2ed73393cad04481c1dfb3f7794921f.js

232 ms

rtrg

rtrg

146 ms

counter

counter

139 ms

dyn-goal-config.js

dyn-goal-config.js

276 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

665 ms

addVisit

addVisit

364 ms

sync_cookie_image_decide

sync_cookie_image_decide

142 ms

tracker

tracker

139 ms

Accessibility Review

russam.ru accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

russam.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

russam.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Russam.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Russam.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

russam.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Russam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: