2 sec in total
178 ms
1.6 sec
205 ms
Visit russianmedicalcouncil.org now to see the best up-to-date Russianmedicalcouncil content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about russianmedicalcouncil.org
Visit russianmedicalcouncil.orgWe analyzed Russianmedicalcouncil.org page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
russianmedicalcouncil.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value5.2 s
60/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
178 ms
342 ms
84 ms
163 ms
317 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Russianmedicalcouncil.org, 27% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) belongs to the original domain Russianmedicalcouncil.org.
Page size can be reduced by 184.6 kB (17%)
1.1 MB
881.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Russianmedicalcouncil.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 800.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 138.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Russianmedicalcouncil needs image optimization as it can save up to 138.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 119 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 317 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Russianmedicalcouncil.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (81%)
42
8
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Russianmedicalcouncil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
russianmedicalcouncil.org
178 ms
russianmedicalcouncil.org
342 ms
style.min.css
84 ms
theme.min.css
163 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
317 ms
post-13.css
240 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
238 ms
swiper.min.css
240 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
239 ms
global.css
241 ms
post-7.css
320 ms
post-60.css
321 ms
post-56.css
320 ms
css
32 ms
fontawesome.min.css
321 ms
solid.min.css
324 ms
jquery.min.js
475 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
394 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
395 ms
animations.min.css
397 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
397 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
398 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
473 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
544 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
555 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
545 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
544 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
633 ms
hooks.min.js
552 ms
i18n.min.js
556 ms
frontend.min.js
558 ms
waypoints.min.js
558 ms
core.min.js
631 ms
frontend.min.js
650 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
650 ms
underscore.min.js
652 ms
wp-util.min.js
657 ms
frontend.min.js
711 ms
%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_2023-06-07_163634833-1024x167.png
302 ms
%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_2023-06-07_163913436.png
614 ms
%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_2023-06-07_175609622.png
302 ms
%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_2023-06-07_175715458.png
303 ms
%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_2023-06-07_175851173.png
225 ms
%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_2023-06-07_175912371.png
302 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
20 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
27 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
34 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
42 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
41 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
42 ms
t5tmIRoYMoaYG0WEOh7HwMeR3T7Pqg.ttf
45 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8Jow.ttf
60 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBi8Jow.ttf
44 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8Jow.ttf
45 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8Jow.ttf
61 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8Jow.ttf
61 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf
59 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8Jow.ttf
60 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBi8Jow.ttf
233 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBi8Jow.ttf
239 ms
russianmedicalcouncil.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
russianmedicalcouncil.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
russianmedicalcouncil.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Russianmedicalcouncil.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Russianmedicalcouncil.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
russianmedicalcouncil.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Russianmedicalcouncil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: