5.1 sec in total
288 ms
4.2 sec
619 ms
Visit rusticae.com now to see the best up-to-date Rusticae content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rusticae.com
Rusticae selected since 1996 the best Boutique Hotels and Small Luxury Hotels in Spain, Europe and America. Find your Boutique Hotels and Book Online!
Visit rusticae.comWe analyzed Rusticae.com page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rusticae.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value15.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value300 ms
79/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
288 ms
1459 ms
59 ms
71 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Rusticae.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rusticae.com.
Page size can be reduced by 921.7 kB (25%)
3.6 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Rusticae.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.0 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rusticae images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 362.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 362.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 304.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rusticae.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 304.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (51%)
69
34
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rusticae. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rusticae.com
288 ms
www.rusticae.com
1459 ms
css
59 ms
css
71 ms
font-awesome.min.css
163 ms
bootstrap.min.css
634 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
319 ms
datepicker.css
242 ms
master.css
568 ms
addendum.css
324 ms
rae.pagination.min.js
257 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
560 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
852 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
394 ms
bootstrap.min.js
482 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
472 ms
bowser.min.js
553 ms
app.min.js
562 ms
mootools-core.js
787 ms
core.js
655 ms
rae.newsletter.min.js
654 ms
rae.cookie.directive.js
653 ms
rae.search.min.js
702 ms
rae.cats.min.js
714 ms
fbevents.js
135 ms
analytics.js
88 ms
ico-phone.png
104 ms
ico-vrb.png
94 ms
logo-header.png
90 ms
en-24.png
90 ms
es-24.png
93 ms
cl-24.png
96 ms
mx-24.png
97 ms
co-24.png
169 ms
pe-24.png
168 ms
ec-24.png
170 ms
ico-globe-blue.png
172 ms
ico-vrblue.png
181 ms
ico-calendar.png
178 ms
ico-xlvrw.png
246 ms
1200x680_ff37256262372d867b872f17f7107f65.jpg
1037 ms
card.png
327 ms
arrow-left.png
249 ms
arrow-right.png
259 ms
ventaja-01.png
263 ms
ventaja-02.png
323 ms
ventaja-03.png
328 ms
ventaja-04.png
340 ms
ico-vdw.png
347 ms
576x336_a1a3cb8a4c21aeddacb9bf17a13b2f7d.jpg
559 ms
576x336_450906cc1e6f75e12bbfcf638689ecca.jpg
726 ms
576x336_21143163b14315c0cb53cfd7bb372433.jpg
808 ms
576x336_a67aaf920f7ffd4ae7f375c7049c4b68.jpg
839 ms
576x336_fc370e3b5bfa1376b3720b15599e7519.jpg
602 ms
576x336_96013ca45272566960dbc02e82bad86f.jpg
797 ms
576x336_ae0362b33890510cdfc1ea6c901e67e5.jpg
773 ms
576x336_f0837b101d7627c3294196c1ff19d16d.jpg
967 ms
576x336_f4d5b56ed60d1cea4021848ad57c0ed0.jpg
944 ms
1200x680_a92b0625ecc2c082c384c607fc5f5054.jpg
1111 ms
ico-play.png
887 ms
step-small-01.png
920 ms
step-small-02.png
967 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
67 ms
collect
27 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1053 ms
20 ms
step-small-03.png
948 ms
ico-premio.png
966 ms
logo-footer.png
963 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_100_eeeeee_1x100.png
1030 ms
rusticae.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rusticae.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rusticae.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rusticae.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rusticae.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rusticae.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rusticae. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: