3.4 sec in total
459 ms
2.8 sec
147 ms
Visit ruthiedavis.com now to see the best up-to-date Ruthie Davis content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ruthiedavis.com
Ruthie Davis - Stand Tall, Stand Strong in Ruthie Davis Power Heels!
Visit ruthiedavis.comWe analyzed Ruthiedavis.com page load time and found that the first response time was 459 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
ruthiedavis.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
6/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value7,350 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.694
7/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
459 ms
160 ms
242 ms
254 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Ruthiedavis.com, 27% (24 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 8% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 663.8 kB (42%)
1.6 MB
913.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Ruthiedavis.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 721.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ruthie Davis images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 389.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 211.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ruthiedavis.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 211.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (56%)
84
37
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ruthie Davis. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ruthiedavis.com
459 ms
font-awesome.min.css
160 ms
bootstrap.min.css
242 ms
style.css
254 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
164 ms
dpSocialFeedr.css
170 ms
mobile.css
176 ms
jquery.js
327 ms
default.js
251 ms
load.js
261 ms
mobile.js
261 ms
pinit.js
9 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
245 ms
bootstrap.min.js
280 ms
appear.js
280 ms
modernizr.js
280 ms
sscr.js
300 ms
skrollr.js
355 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
355 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
356 ms
jquery.instafeed.js
354 ms
jquery.dpSocialFeedr.js
354 ms
jquery.maximage.min.js
379 ms
jquery.jigowatt.js
436 ms
jquery.sticky.js
439 ms
scripts.js
434 ms
logo.png
117 ms
RnNZfQn2o2xpggJQqefCOervMbPIci5mujDPJnvl43kv6Rtxjyh5gHN_JKVzeU-aaGz3pePFgxfoAAtZJZNx8mveVTc-11j98EfuAJVcumUenA=s0-d-e1-ft
104 ms
logo.png
165 ms
logo-alt.png
171 ms
ajax-loader.gif
202 ms
ruthie_email_popup.jpg
875 ms
all.js
291 ms
plugins.js
322 ms
ruthiedavis.js
244 ms
responsive-menu.png
245 ms
0114_RDHomeB-978x550.jpg
194 ms
widgets.js
174 ms
pill_gothic_300mg_light-webfont.ttf
309 ms
pillgothic300mg-semibd-webfont.ttf
437 ms
analytics.js
57 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
358 ms
collect
11 ms
pinit_main.js
38 ms
recent
239 ms
likebox.php
308 ms
like.php
177 ms
149 ms
xd_arbiter.php
231 ms
xd_arbiter.php
434 ms
12328228_502666493250328_759620443_n.jpg
49 ms
11931208_510483919154744_1892960674_n.jpg
57 ms
12797750_1702781993312191_557761273_n.jpg
48 ms
12797612_1737448769875034_432074939_n.jpg
45 ms
10953337_571822602972798_512242908_n.jpg
82 ms
927560_1670416886552885_1015735859_n.jpg
44 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
507 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
569 ms
UThj8VI7Xhd.css
614 ms
FL1kvZ1wVUz.css
680 ms
7HwxA8gVs6-.css
690 ms
cuTBFFsHWNo.css
749 ms
ljoX-PyMzJF.css
755 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
812 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
748 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
746 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
764 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
851 ms
1QuX41zDRrx.js
852 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
884 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
1015 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
890 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
570 ms
12573792_10153912366934439_6371726587184391444_n.png
114 ms
12647195_10153912370699439_7085954776736044072_n.jpg
97 ms
1655846_10154027410279439_1707258281315602426_n.jpg
98 ms
971438_10154026731899439_2338416698007336086_n.jpg
97 ms
11020464_10154026207499439_1048561445996220557_n.jpg
95 ms
10399665_10154024249399439_4271838244190161038_n.jpg
97 ms
11234053_10154023790474439_8428128734625739249_n.jpg
99 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
93 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
92 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
92 ms
aeO1ik7i7-T.png
342 ms
K00K-UgnsKu.png
92 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
71 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
136 ms
ping
98 ms
ruthiedavis.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ruthiedavis.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ruthiedavis.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ruthiedavis.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ruthiedavis.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ruthiedavis.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ruthie Davis. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: