7.2 sec in total
1.4 sec
4.1 sec
1.6 sec
Welcome to rutor.in homepage info - get ready to check Rutor best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rutor.in
rutor - Открытый торрент трекер
Visit rutor.inWe analyzed Rutor.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rutor.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value2.9 s
81/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.363
30/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
1406 ms
329 ms
1507 ms
1172 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Rutor.in, 4% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rutor.in.
Page size can be reduced by 264.4 kB (49%)
542.1 kB
277.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Rutor.in main page is 542.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 322.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rutor needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 64.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rutor.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
25
25
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rutor. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
rutor.in
1406 ms
stylesheet.css
329 ms
cssjs.php
1507 ms
jquery-min.js
1172 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
333 ms
cssjs.php
886 ms
import1.css
1035 ms
logoo.png
520 ms
zk.jpg
515 ms
nk.jpg
476 ms
mult.jpg
472 ms
serial.jpg
456 ms
tv.jpg
1037 ms
sport.jpg
443 ms
anime.jpg
478 ms
nauka.jpg
479 ms
igry.jpg
489 ms
muz.jpg
790 ms
soft.jpg
637 ms
umor.jpg
637 ms
knigi.jpg
639 ms
hibyt.jpg
650 ms
raznoe.jpg
784 ms
menu2.png
782 ms
menu.png
1069 ms
filesave.png
791 ms
watch.js
325 ms
rutor.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
rutor.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rutor.in SEO score
N/A
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rutor.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Russian. Our system also found out that Rutor.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rutor.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rutor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: