Tools & Wizards About Us
rwconsultinggroup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

rwconsultinggroup.com

Bookkeeping Service | Atlanta | RWConsultingGroup.cm

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

847 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

73 ms

rwconsultinggroup.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rwconsultinggroup.com now to see the best up-to-date Rw Consulting Group content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rwconsultinggroup.com

Whether you need Bookkeeping, Tax Preparation or an Outsourced CFO, RWConsultingGroup provides bookkeeping services, financial and advisory services.

Visit rwconsultinggroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rwconsultinggroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 847 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rwconsultinggroup.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rwconsultinggroup.com

847 ms

minified.js

44 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

87 ms

polyfill.min.js

1066 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8e38bc77.bundle.min.js

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rwconsultinggroup.com, 49% (19 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 463.7 kB (56%)

Content Size

825.4 kB

After Optimization

361.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rwconsultinggroup.com main page is 825.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 520.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 415.6 kB

  • Original 520.4 kB
  • After minification 518.9 kB
  • After compression 104.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 415.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 10.2 kB
  • After minification 10.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rw Consulting Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 294.8 kB
  • After minification 294.8 kB
  • After compression 246.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (34%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rw Consulting Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rwconsultinggroup.com

www.rwconsultinggroup.com

847 ms

minified.js

minified.js

44 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

87 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1066 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8e38bc77.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.8e38bc77.bundle.min.js

69 ms

main.36b6e602.bundle.min.js

main.36b6e602.bundle.min.js

69 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

69 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

73 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

71 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

74 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

71 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

72 ms

2479ac233f0c4152af5805d671706fac.jpg

2479ac233f0c4152af5805d671706fac.jpg

76 ms

4fa872fd75d046b8a227a5202176ab14.jpg

4fa872fd75d046b8a227a5202176ab14.jpg

114 ms

20371a167944413589d6dc0e902cd367.jpeg

20371a167944413589d6dc0e902cd367.jpeg

257 ms

4d8abe_26b0a5ad187a47949fc63d1c3cda509d~mv2.jpg

4d8abe_26b0a5ad187a47949fc63d1c3cda509d~mv2.jpg

459 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

88 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

7 ms

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

13 ms

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

13 ms

121 ms

114 ms

117 ms

117 ms

114 ms

110 ms

146 ms

143 ms

145 ms

145 ms

142 ms

141 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

22 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

8 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

16 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

4 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

8 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

4 ms

Accessibility Review

rwconsultinggroup.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rwconsultinggroup.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rwconsultinggroup.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rwconsultinggroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rwconsultinggroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rwconsultinggroup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: