7.3 sec in total
761 ms
5.7 sec
834 ms
Visit rwe.de now to see the best up-to-date RWE content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rwe.de
We dared to make a new start: With over 125 years of history, RWE has fundamentally changed and is now a leading supplier of renewable energies worldwide.
Visit rwe.deWe analyzed Rwe.de page load time and found that the first response time was 761 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rwe.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value45.3 s
0/100
25%
Value18.7 s
0/100
10%
Value4,550 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value36.1 s
0/100
10%
761 ms
435 ms
312 ms
871 ms
836 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rwe.de, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Tools.eurolandir.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Rwe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 789.7 kB (14%)
5.5 MB
4.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Rwe.de main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 626.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RWE needs image optimization as it can save up to 626.1 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rwe.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (26%)
38
28
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RWE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rwe.com
761 ms
435 ms
nkStyles.20240521.9.min.css
312 ms
uikit.20240521.9.min.css
871 ms
vendor.20240521.9.min.js
836 ms
vendor.20240521.9.min.css
469 ms
VisitorIdentification.js
310 ms
runtime.js
263 ms
nkJavascript.20240521.9.min.js
624 ms
app.20240521.9.min.js
2194 ms
uikit.20240521.9.min.js
494 ms
appExtended.20240521.9.min.js
2188 ms
gtm.js
1270 ms
STA01-europawahl-2024.jpg
1137 ms
STA01-q3-2018-final-ohne.jpg
1164 ms
STA01-cmd.jpg
1416 ms
STA01-absolventen.jpg
1056 ms
STA01-wasserstoff-kampagne.jpg
1219 ms
kurznachrichtenmodul-info.svg
441 ms
loosefield2.png
1054 ms
loosefield1.png
1054 ms
TEA-unsere-energie.jpg
1089 ms
TEA-leistungen.jpg
1306 ms
TEA-projektvorhaben-bauprojekte-fuer-windparks-und-solaranlagen.jpg
1291 ms
combined-energy.png
1374 ms
TEA-home.jpg
1374 ms
TEA-discover.jpg
1411 ms
TEA-content-hub.jpg
1493 ms
RWE_Icon_weiss_Energiegruen_hell_facebook.svg
1430 ms
RWE_Icon_weiss_Energiegruen_hell_X.svg
1499 ms
RWE_Icon_weiss_Energiegruen_hell_Mail.svg
1505 ms
RWE_Icon_weiss_Energiegruen_hell_LinkedIn.svg
1550 ms
RWE_Icon_weiss_Energiegruen_hell_Xing.svg
2063 ms
RWE_Icon_weiss_Energiegruen_hell_X_UK.svg
1561 ms
RWE_Icon_weiss_Energiegruen_hell_LinkedIn_CEO.svg
2191 ms
RWE_Icon_weiss_Energiegruen_hell_Instagram.svg
1665 ms
618 ms
TIC02-kontakt-und-service.png
1327 ms
TIC02-rwe-betriebsstandorte.png
1371 ms
TIC02-dokument.png
1342 ms
RWESans-Medium.woff
1453 ms
RWESans-Regular.woff
1566 ms
RWESans-Bold.woff
1567 ms
RWE_Icon_Font.ttf
1567 ms
print.css
137 ms
rwe.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rwe.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rwe.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rwe.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rwe.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rwe.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RWE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: