Tools & Wizards About Us
rwm.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 96% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rwm.in

Rwm.in Domain Name Is Available to Buy - Domain Name Marketplace

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

235 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

216 ms

rwm.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rwm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rwm.in

DaaZ, largest domain marketplace simple, easy & secure platform to buy domain names. Buy this Rwm.in Domain at best price at DaaZ.

Visit rwm.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rwm.in page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rwm.in performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rwm.in

235 ms

rwm.in

252 ms

rwm.in

254 ms

style2.css

141 ms

bootstrap.min.css

154 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rwm.in, 94% (29 requests) were made to Daaz.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (542 ms) relates to the external source Daaz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 44.9 kB (22%)

Content Size

204.5 kB

After Optimization

159.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rwm.in main page is 204.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 84.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 27.8 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.9 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 84.8 kB
  • After minification 76.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rwm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 41.0 kB
  • After minification 41.0 kB
  • After compression 41.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 322 B

  • Original 35.0 kB
  • After minification 35.0 kB
  • After compression 34.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rwm.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (30%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rwm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rwm.in

rwm.in

235 ms

rwm.in

rwm.in

252 ms

rwm.in

rwm.in

254 ms

style2.css

style2.css

141 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

154 ms

css2.css

css2.css

145 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

138 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

150 ms

logo.png

logo.png

174 ms

medal-1.png

medal-1.png

267 ms

paymentgateway-logos.svg

paymentgateway-logos.svg

360 ms

tooltip-icon.png

tooltip-icon.png

268 ms

moneyback-guarantee-icon.png

moneyback-guarantee-icon.png

268 ms

trust-stamp.png

trust-stamp.png

278 ms

money-back-img1.png

money-back-img1.png

281 ms

money-back-img2.png

money-back-img2.png

384 ms

money-back-img3.png

money-back-img3.png

395 ms

faster-ownership-transfer-icon.png

faster-ownership-transfer-icon.png

388 ms

transper-img1.png

transper-img1.png

403 ms

transper-img2.png

transper-img2.png

406 ms

secure-payments-icon.png

secure-payments-icon.png

484 ms

secure-payment-img1.png

secure-payment-img1.png

498 ms

secure-payment-img2.png

secure-payment-img2.png

500 ms

twitterX.png

twitterX.png

515 ms

installment-agreement-w.png

installment-agreement-w.png

542 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

410 ms

vedd3670a3b1c4e178fdfb0cc912d969e1713874337387

vedd3670a3b1c4e178fdfb0cc912d969e1713874337387

62 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

303 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

126 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

188 ms

Accessibility Review

rwm.in accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rwm.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rwm.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rwm.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rwm.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rwm.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rwm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: