8.4 sec in total
1.8 sec
6.4 sec
265 ms
Welcome to rws.com homepage info - get ready to check RWS best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about rws.com
90 of the world’s top 100 brands trust RWS to globalize their content and protect their ideas.
Visit rws.comWe analyzed Rws.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rws.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value5,930 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value29.9 s
0/100
10%
1783 ms
178 ms
283 ms
191 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Rws.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 221.6 kB (13%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rws.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RWS images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 83.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.2 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rws.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 107.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (60%)
45
18
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RWS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rws.com
1783 ms
style.css
178 ms
template.css
283 ms
corporex.slider.css
191 ms
template.css
194 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
caption.js
182 ms
bootstrap.min.js
184 ms
template.js
375 ms
sp-smart-slider.js
373 ms
html5fallback.js
374 ms
antiscroll.css
1197 ms
jquery-mousewheel.js
362 ms
antiscroll.js
1203 ms
css
46 ms
font-awesome.min.css
16 ms
script.opentracker.net
23 ms
mixpanel-2-latest.min.js
31 ms
ga.js
29 ms
bg.jpg
2025 ms
de.gif
1004 ms
fr.gif
1014 ms
zh_cn.gif
2009 ms
ja.gif
1008 ms
rws-logo.png
998 ms
qae.png
2021 ms
i.js
26 ms
6560cfb717546626942ca826f9a343415f1c5652.1.js
99 ms
img.gif
980 ms
london.jpg
2003 ms
newyork.jpg
2010 ms
paris.jpg
2016 ms
japan.jpg
2081 ms
berlin.jpg
3008 ms
beijing.jpg
3006 ms
sydney.jpg
2178 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
56 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
57 ms
tt0146m_-webfont.svg
3028 ms
tt0140m_-webfont.svg
3036 ms
tt0146m_-webfont.woff
2941 ms
tt0140m_-webfont.woff
2953 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
55 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
54 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
54 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
3277 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3098 ms
IcoMoon.woff
3115 ms
rws-font-webfont.svg
3112 ms
rws-font-webfont.woff
3202 ms
__utm.gif
32 ms
18 ms
collect
61 ms
js
20 ms
log.opentracker.net
199 ms
in.php
138 ms
e
15 ms
rws.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rws.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rws.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rws.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rws.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rws.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RWS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: