4.4 sec in total
978 ms
3 sec
385 ms
Click here to check amazing Rws content for Mexico. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rws.mx
Diseño y Hospedaje Web
Visit rws.mxWe analyzed Rws.mx page load time and found that the first response time was 978 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rws.mx performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.128
82/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
978 ms
545 ms
207 ms
144 ms
142 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Rws.mx, 18% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rws.mx.
Page size can be reduced by 514.8 kB (31%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Rws.mx main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rws images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 226.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 199.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rws.mx needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 199.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (73%)
45
12
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rws. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rws.mx
978 ms
545 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
207 ms
styles.css
144 ms
front-gridder.css
142 ms
css
25 ms
css
38 ms
css
45 ms
css
46 ms
style.css
280 ms
default.min.css
148 ms
shortcodes.css
321 ms
font-awesome.min.css
7 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
275 ms
page_templates.css
278 ms
jquery.js
497 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
348 ms
slippry.min.js
367 ms
slippry.css
372 ms
content-shortcodes.css
369 ms
box-shortcodes.css
371 ms
qtip.css
376 ms
other-shortcodes.css
453 ms
font-awesome.min.css
7 ms
jquery.form.min.js
458 ms
scripts.js
502 ms
comment-reply.min.js
506 ms
superfish.js
512 ms
custom.js
585 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
570 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
732 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
732 ms
wp-embed.min.js
731 ms
qtip.js
783 ms
other-shortcodes.js
732 ms
720 ms
logo_RWS-300x99.png
384 ms
banner_inicio.jpg
873 ms
ico_paquete_platino_small.png
528 ms
ico_paquete_oro_small.png
529 ms
ico_paquete_plata_small.png
587 ms
ico_paquete_bronce_small.png
610 ms
img_mitiendaenlinea.png
867 ms
dispositivos_inicio.png
1092 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
9 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
10 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
9 ms
analytics.js
14 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
17 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
18 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
16 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
24 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
18 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
16 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
16 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
17 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
16 ms
collect
20 ms
widget_v2.135.js
14 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3 ms
sy-loader.gif
206 ms
rws.mx accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rws.mx best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rws.mx SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rws.mx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rws.mx main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rws.mx
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rws. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: