Tools & Wizards About Us
rwswebsites.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

rwswebsites.com

Web Design Conway Myrtle Beach | Responsive Web Development

Page Load Speed

230 ms in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

130 ms

Page Rendered

69 ms

rwswebsites.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rwswebsites.com homepage info - get ready to check Rws Web Sites best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rwswebsites.com

Web Design Conway Myrtle Beach by RWS best understands those who live and do business there and using SEO tactics that will best target others in your area.

Visit rwswebsites.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rwswebsites.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 199 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rwswebsites.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rwswebsites.com

31 ms

rwswebsites.com

16 ms

sucuri-firewall-block.css

18 ms

css

32 ms

font

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rwswebsites.com, 20% (1 request) were made to Cdn.sucuri.net and 20% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (32 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.2 kB (45%)

Content Size

15.8 kB

After Optimization

8.6 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rwswebsites.com main page is 15.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 13.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 13.4 kB
  • After minification 13.4 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rwswebsites.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • CSS

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rws Web Sites. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

rwswebsites.com

rwswebsites.com

31 ms

rwswebsites.com

rwswebsites.com

16 ms

sucuri-firewall-block.css

sucuri-firewall-block.css

18 ms

css

css

32 ms

font

font

19 ms

Accessibility Review

rwswebsites.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rwswebsites.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rwswebsites.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rwswebsites.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rwswebsites.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rwswebsites.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rws Web Sites. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: