Tools & Wizards About Us
rxchecker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

rxchecker.com

The Arctic Burn

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

229 ms

Resources Loaded

744 ms

Page Rendered

513 ms

rxchecker.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rxchecker.com homepage info - get ready to check Rxchecker best content right away, or after learning these important things about rxchecker.com

Visit rxchecker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rxchecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rxchecker.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

229 ms

style.css

47 ms

responsive.css

89 ms

font-awesome.min.css

32 ms

css2

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rxchecker.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (318 ms) relates to the external source Cbtb.clickbank.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 190.7 kB (26%)

Content Size

736.3 kB

After Optimization

545.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rxchecker.com main page is 736.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 442.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

  • Original 56.3 kB
  • After minification 52.0 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 442.2 kB
  • After minification 439.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rxchecker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 134.2 kB

  • Original 223.5 kB
  • After minification 223.5 kB
  • After compression 89.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.2 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 14.2 kB
  • After minification 6.5 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rxchecker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (62%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rxchecker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

index.php

229 ms

style.css

style.css

47 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

89 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

32 ms

css2

css2

40 ms

price-table.css

price-table.css

77 ms

owl-carousel.css

owl-carousel.css

74 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

27 ms

owl-carousel.js

owl-carousel.js

75 ms

cbtb.clickbank.net

cbtb.clickbank.net

318 ms

css2

css2

19 ms

css2

css2

27 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

27 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

26 ms

huvtzo9omn

huvtzo9omn

60 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

64 ms

hotjar-3562363.js

hotjar-3562363.js

97 ms

back.png

back.png

84 ms

metabolism.jpg

metabolism.jpg

71 ms

circle-icon2.png

circle-icon2.png

28 ms

weight-loss.jpg

weight-loss.jpg

54 ms

seal.png

seal.png

127 ms

one-bttl.png

one-bttl.png

98 ms

three-btl.png

three-btl.png

201 ms

bestValue-crnr.jpg

bestValue-crnr.jpg

80 ms

six-btl.png

six-btl.png

119 ms

nutravillelogowhite.png

nutravillelogowhite.png

107 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

19 ms

injectable.js

injectable.js

97 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv18E.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv18E.ttf

20 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv18E.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv18E.ttf

73 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o18E.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o18E.ttf

35 ms

Accessibility Review

rxchecker.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rxchecker.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rxchecker.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rxchecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rxchecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rxchecker.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rxchecker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: