7.1 sec in total
2.8 sec
3.9 sec
443 ms
Visit south_africa.reviewportal.org now to see the best up-to-date South Africa Reviewportal content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about south_africa.reviewportal.org
Wilmington DE - Evaluate your experience with a business or specialist. Share your experience.
Visit south_africa.reviewportal.orgWe analyzed South_africa.reviewportal.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
south_africa.reviewportal.org performance score
2764 ms
446 ms
452 ms
49 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original South_africa.reviewportal.org, 13% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Reviewportal.org.
Page size can be reduced by 124.0 kB (55%)
225.9 kB
101.9 kB
In fact, the total size of South_africa.reviewportal.org main page is 225.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 66.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, South Africa Reviewportal needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 37% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. South_africa.reviewportal.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (40%)
60
36
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of South Africa Reviewportal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.reviewportal.org
2764 ms
style2.css
446 ms
portal.js
452 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
79 ms
sdk.js
532 ms
ssl.png
118 ms
en.gif;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
117 ms
es.gif;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
117 ms
zh.gif;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
239 ms
ru.gif;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
239 ms
uk.gif;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
237 ms
thumb_down_4.gif
238 ms
plusone.js
127 ms
widgets.js
216 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
203 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
202 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
285 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
290 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
290 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
293 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
292 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
282 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
397 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
396 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
397 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
396 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
396 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
408 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
590 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
587 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
587 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
589 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
587 ms
image;jsessionid=1B7C86D9B283415E92B5D3531802593E
588 ms
203 ms
xd_arbiter.php
31 ms
xd_arbiter.php
53 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
21 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
50 ms
fastbutton
137 ms
postmessageRelay
100 ms
like.php
192 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
177 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
18 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
17 ms
login_button.php
100 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
29 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
xd_arbiter.php
14 ms
hUSYDpLL5L-.js
84 ms
pO2d5bFWS8j.png
70 ms
7_Tav3rWEg4.gif
70 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
69 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
54 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
44 ms
print.css
89 ms
style-mobile.css
183 ms
jot
96 ms
prompt_en.png
90 ms
south_africa.reviewportal.org SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise South_africa.reviewportal.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that South_africa.reviewportal.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
south_africa.reviewportal.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of South Africa Reviewportal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: