12.6 sec in total
2.4 sec
10 sec
159 ms
Visit survey.review.com now to see the best up-to-date Survey Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about survey.review.com
The Princeton Review's Opinion Surveys for undergraduate and graduate students.
Visit survey.review.comWe analyzed Survey.review.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 10.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
survey.review.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value4,100 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value24.4 s
0/100
10%
2419 ms
4775 ms
101 ms
200 ms
2819 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Survey.review.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Survey.review.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (66%)
3.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Survey.review.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.4 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Survey Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Survey.review.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (43%)
28
16
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Survey Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
survey.review.com
2419 ms
4775 ms
soapclient.js
101 ms
nodots.js
200 ms
surveyLookup1.js
2819 ms
princetonReview.css
2106 ms
sdc.js
107 ms
reviewlogo.jpg
3158 ms
spacer.gif
1057 ms
title_survey_2015.jpg
340 ms
all.js
161 ms
dot_line_400.gif
1064 ms
Book%20Cascade.jpg
4104 ms
Best%20379%20Image.jpg
174 ms
Biz%20296%20Image.jpg
261 ms
Law%20169%20Image.jpg
394 ms
dot_bg.gif
272 ms
dot_16.gif
73 ms
tl_16.gif
86 ms
tr_16.gif
116 ms
bl_16.gif
171 ms
br_16.gif
164 ms
star.gif
207 ms
179 ms
xd_arbiter.php
128 ms
xd_arbiter.php
254 ms
as_close_win_but.gif
1162 ms
footer_shadow.jpg
1041 ms
nacac_seal.gif
56 ms
like.php
149 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
293 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
329 ms
survey.review.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
survey.review.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
survey.review.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Survey.review.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Survey.review.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
survey.review.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Survey Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: