21.3 sec in total
34 ms
20.2 sec
976 ms
Visit tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com now to see the best up-to-date Tucsonusd 1 Rosetta Stone content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com
Rosetta Stone's award-winning language learning program combines proven methods and the world's best speech recognition technology. Choose from 25 languages.
Visit tucsonusd1.rosettastone.comWe analyzed Tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 21.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value4,090 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.46
19/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
34 ms
239 ms
18 ms
39 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com, 97% (70 requests) were made to Rosettastone.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Datadoghq-browser-agent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) relates to the external source Rosettastone.com.
Page size can be reduced by 370.3 kB (23%)
1.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 995.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 360.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 360.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tucsonusd 1 Rosetta Stone images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (16%)
69
58
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tucsonusd 1 Rosetta Stone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com
34 ms
www.rosettastone.com
239 ms
datadog-rum.js
18 ms
145249b32d6a072e.css
39 ms
792d7eaf9026e9c1.css
36 ms
90215a6625878f1b.css
54 ms
polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js
66 ms
webpack-57447bc4b376680e.js
84 ms
framework-326f6104f1d6e0dc.js
65 ms
main-9a72c3a6a7679a9e.js
80 ms
_app-331a77b518262464.js
91 ms
973-bef40aa678b7c690.js
97 ms
5213-b5f77dc73f88e8e5.js
82 ms
5475-de41f0991a1cb1fc.js
89 ms
%5Blocale%5D-0570697f4b00914b.js
98 ms
_buildManifest.js
98 ms
_ssgManifest.js
117 ms
get-immersed-en-US-800.53dcf396.png
521 ms
feel-supported-en-US-800.50ff4ffa.png
86 ms
express-yourself-en-US-800.fbbe77d1.png
73 ms
147 ms
individuals-1x.a8cbcfae.webp
74 ms
enterprise-1x.18a73388.webp
85 ms
schools-1x.d5d50541.webp
86 ms
144 ms
144 ms
131 ms
149 ms
184 ms
185 ms
230 ms
189 ms
229 ms
233 ms
236 ms
231 ms
261 ms
260 ms
338 ms
263 ms
282 ms
300 ms
303 ms
267 ms
305 ms
290 ms
311 ms
321 ms
19922 ms
332 ms
344 ms
343 ms
330 ms
380 ms
386 ms
375 ms
366 ms
407 ms
359 ms
352 ms
348 ms
375 ms
387 ms
351 ms
341 ms
374 ms
326 ms
323 ms
346 ms
340 ms
dropdown-arrow.69a9dab1.svg
334 ms
stats-bg-1625.40e3a058.svg
318 ms
tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tucsonusd1.rosettastone.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tucsonusd 1 Rosetta Stone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: