Tools & Wizards About Us
userm.rosegal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

userm.rosegal.com

Plus Size Clothing, Plus Size Dress Online Store | Rosegal

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

980 ms

userm.rosegal.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to userm.rosegal.com homepage info - get ready to check Userm Rosegal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about userm.rosegal.com

Shop the latest cheap plus size clothing for curves & mens fashion styles online with free shipping, including plus size dresses, plus size swimwear, accessories, jewelry and other trendy styles at af...

Visit userm.rosegal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Userm.rosegal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

userm.rosegal.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,110 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.658

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

userm.rosegal.com

32 ms

userm.rosegal.com

28 ms

m.rosegal.com

41 ms

m.rosegal.com

25 ms

base_min.css

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Userm.rosegal.com, 38% (20 requests) were made to Uidesign.rglcdn.com and 25% (13 requests) were made to Css.rglcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Uidesign.rglcdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 529.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Userm.rosegal.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 330.2 kB

  • Original 414.4 kB
  • After minification 412.1 kB
  • After compression 84.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 330.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 198.4 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Userm Rosegal needs image optimization as it can save up to 198.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 182 B

  • Original 295.2 kB
  • After minification 295.2 kB
  • After compression 295.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 359 B

  • Original 23.5 kB
  • After minification 23.5 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Userm.rosegal.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (33%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Userm Rosegal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

userm.rosegal.com

userm.rosegal.com

32 ms

userm.rosegal.com

userm.rosegal.com

28 ms

m.rosegal.com

m.rosegal.com

41 ms

m.rosegal.com

m.rosegal.com

25 ms

base_min.css

base_min.css

62 ms

2f00dbaec400b17b42730b63d37d53da.css

2f00dbaec400b17b42730b63d37d53da.css

111 ms

exchange.html

exchange.html

52 ms

var_languages.min.js

var_languages.min.js

85 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

90 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

219 ms

firebase-app.js

firebase-app.js

52 ms

firebase-messaging.js

firebase-messaging.js

88 ms

firebase-performance.js

firebase-performance.js

151 ms

logsss.common.min.js

logsss.common.min.js

83 ms

1d242fe09cf9e0e724d8c08cdf7a8f03.js

1d242fe09cf9e0e724d8c08cdf7a8f03.js

149 ms

vue.min.js

vue.min.js

50 ms

client.bundle.49c5cf75.js

client.bundle.49c5cf75.js

80 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

79 ms

bg_image_default.png

bg_image_default.png

3 ms

Mlogovip.png

Mlogovip.png

60 ms

layer.css

layer.css

39 ms

fr478x484.png

fr478x484.png

867 ms

loading_tm.gif

loading_tm.gif

311 ms

m02.jpg

m02.jpg

861 ms

m03.jpg

m03.jpg

843 ms

m04.jpg

m04.jpg

737 ms

m09.jpg

m09.jpg

934 ms

m10.jpg

m10.jpg

1024 ms

m14.jpg

m14.jpg

1287 ms

m15.jpg

m15.jpg

1548 ms

m16.jpg

m16.jpg

1634 ms

1024.png

1024.png

873 ms

sprite@2x.png

sprite@2x.png

16 ms

Rubik-Regular.woff

Rubik-Regular.woff

47 ms

index.php

index.php

201 ms

font_1508924_68obwjkhx59.css

font_1508924_68obwjkhx59.css

35 ms

35 ms

foot_tag.jpg

foot_tag.jpg

18 ms

49 ms

m01.jpg

m01.jpg

1279 ms

m06.jpg

m06.jpg

1602 ms

m07.jpg

m07.jpg

1460 ms

m08.jpg

m08.jpg

1724 ms

m11.jpg

m11.jpg

1937 ms

m12.jpg

m12.jpg

1964 ms

m13.jpg

m13.jpg

1909 ms

m17.jpg

m17.jpg

2000 ms

Rubik-Medium.woff

Rubik-Medium.woff

19 ms

smart_popup.css

smart_popup.css

5 ms

39 ms

smart_popup.min.js

smart_popup.min.js

76 ms

m-goods_fast-a-ajax_super_goods_list.htm

m-goods_fast-a-ajax_super_goods_list.htm

108 ms

Accessibility Review

userm.rosegal.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

userm.rosegal.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

userm.rosegal.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Userm.rosegal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Userm.rosegal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

userm.rosegal.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Userm Rosegal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: